IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]

Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@gmail.com> Wed, 26 July 2017 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <damien.saucez@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB76132011; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iGgc_W2XLn7T; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3078131C99; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id 184so19594856wmo.3; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=056DuJa7JzB3ZWRDM8q2AaORsLEpDQU2EhAv9p4oGxk=; b=pQejZBt+nSSxXR4jyGiZcht3x9YO72weMbvlqHRqM9Ahp52RdjiJtxgkzObxm8zAnb MFnzfEslst8kFY4i314bwGqcQxJJh76/sPpLFkLCkLOwxYsOF9l6k8pniZMLnuUckeTm o3cjnyB2K7EPWCg7HzLzJifQxw2qQY9gD9UKuWKJU8fk5auS6GaAIKirOZrY9aGPCApk 3MiHfGkNLt2RpNaNCQlJaXV5qjyQcUyO3a+L+mzq6QH+iaS1tyvSEtLvf1AfT9d4DtLD YJTWGrW1cABCMSF6HMMCXCtmj9bGnxsvZXi08X8Fn5emtNrix0q3Nwvxq757octbBi7P 4g7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=056DuJa7JzB3ZWRDM8q2AaORsLEpDQU2EhAv9p4oGxk=; b=JPbvUUxD6ahI9cVRnSK2yrM2+L3RMIrDACfioVetxpnJUr5nRmApjNOtEo33DMbMZk Qn2RJVvEAsYzyMGUWWeQO76S9ic4zL2l2NJo8p/nKjZgaJmebF343FejffOqktAaFTyV CGGfLKMGL3cp3H57l8qDsq38BTNIIV8TUIUt067xfc21LYIw2n//AQ6kcNcxmN041W9E JKo7uejCLfjm3Hxi2LYwNIo/RhPmnGQKmYArCLZPpIASIiERjw6zhFwawtdHkXCaPlSK jbJ3hlhc6111FDjh7NlVgyCv5gqetp1eeCUzQYjBfSsINVBScFcPNdnEo5wRqhNEEBzR WyeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111nmdeb+q2g8M3hJwMwgBiBvEyYsEha9cd9fW3F14amXMd6M/OW WYuAH2diXKvKy/Yluio=
X-Received: by 10.28.98.137 with SMTP id w131mr546068wmb.158.1501070154441; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from saehrimnir.inria.fr (saehrimnir.inria.fr. [138.96.206.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r129sm13908658wmg.42.2017.07.26.04.55.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 04:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AFC6BD1-5E44-4146-AF97-DF0EBE340B78@gigix.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:55:51 +0200
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6612F45C-F2A6-4DC1-BE77-EBC802BEA066@gmail.com>
References: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net> <7AFC6BD1-5E44-4146-AF97-DF0EBE340B78@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/IhdZPCXnAV6q3Y-Yvmj893QXSoM>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:55:58 -0000

I support the adoption of draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf

Damien Saucez

> On 26 Jul 2017, at 13:16, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> The call ends August 10th 2017 ! 
> 
> Luigi
> 
>> On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:41, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> During the 99th IETF authors of the document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt
>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00]
>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on adoption.
>> 
>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the meeting outcome. 
>> The call ends on  August 3rd 2017.
>> 
>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.
>> 
>> Recall that:
>> 
>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to 
>>   modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid.  
>>   Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
>> 
>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, 
>>   and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>> 
>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can 
>>   begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>>                       
>>                                                                                                         
>> Luigi and Joel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email