IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 26 July 2017 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D79A131CFD; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c0VZxalcUdcf; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com (mail-pg0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4F7131D08; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id k190so2043040pgk.4; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EG2WXjbfznJHHBcJZJPxFqa2UzZ0jDg7aZpY6HtFFbI=; b=aIncHL4CxCLAk/tTXMDSBn5gWESxDNF3Ve92YbdZu2IKFjTFht/69p8aorX/AZ9r2J HFP1vF55P7ptX8uEvRjfRk4pqWRCgt3/ii+AsWWjE5r8Eb5FChnG/5mNhiObwNDxAM51 mKGK9gI/eVXZtx6TSJ15vB0KwZx3mYRODNSZ4/PIlVofW7H3M3beuJO/8AS1ODz42iah SAX/SXtX/fkHeqfI4qULXHIKRRDm+d9H2+my4P8I5u/emy9FOzL64/tIRkeBL4KUCFtw Omh9iq78J+CR2S5dVqS+PVD37tl8hraeH6DUZjDUCi0QUcMyfJSRio3YKn5H8JvuwUta yAtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EG2WXjbfznJHHBcJZJPxFqa2UzZ0jDg7aZpY6HtFFbI=; b=GAsE7hwbfnoBkcW+Jci4Td2fwehaE6BXbB7y4xIPRQU9Ko9m/JHTkv/Zm/hVGm8/VN bc152Id0xd5Dga8/T9n3dn9vFs+IlzQPw0l3L37/rA6Gs4gUSLByc7wM/CD4dh2TbA+p rIz8k0TSjbMW9SFL9kOqrbVoC9hu3S7QuJBvsLJducKsonkZpwE+e3+RkKZtyG2ZIixW 47if/ikSFyGqi8Ksw+GqTmNt/LOszIAypTs7w4C9NWnfpsk2s43mqQe+CZOVeJgcyHuD BRWbJqy2F4HsefhBwOWLLjKTLWdGvHuDQ7fSQ+5n5CEdZV2b02Z9QICXYFQfxI0N6uGf 8mVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113ldxbdzjL508cYjorAHYH0n6E+8V0jm4de74B8FDFZ4tZOsFRf f/N4pXS3ZLm4uQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.167.79 with SMTP id w15mr1370119pgo.22.1501085937134; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q8sm34313738pfl.89.2017.07.26.09.18.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:18:55 -0700
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <99D29632-E65E-4C48-B40D-B20AE66CAA73@gmail.com>
References: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/nzPULungpu9xHmQaafqE99JexCE>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:18:59 -0000

I support draft as an WG document.

Dino

> On Jul 26, 2017, at 2:41 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> During the 99th IETF authors of the document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00]
> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on adoption.
> 
> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the meeting outcome. 
> The call ends on  August 3rd 2017.
> 
> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.
> 
> Recall that:
> 
> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to 
>   modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid.  
>   Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
> 
> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, 
>   and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can 
>   begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>                       
>                                                                                                         
> Luigi and Joel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email