IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Standard Track

Florin Coras <fcoras.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 25 August 2015 10:19 UTC

Return-Path: <fcoras.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130D01ACEE9 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLAGxEXdVlNW for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87F331ACE4E for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdob1 with SMTP id b1so65128563pdo.2 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Vs1bKYWYINwzG3pgTDzLpe+RhRGFiC1JRw0cS7eqbPg=; b=nPIExSlIZLvFyBBaprYBkE3SjClx2gxHTDg0oFMMqnRAbuhfql2iXJm1iqhfPrWnTl 18llbgPHTeHOBI6Qs4ul/91PNd4mgSvwGjcWe1ICnsDL2/wLMAZyUDgrjE2JnWIMIHEI ku8l1VCjrN1bubQejqGIbNheYSXSmltd8ILbm71ZTzHEgCzm7bWuLiOkSTbhBYQLTMWn WqjYESEFCdJx9kqFHzjZJF3t9wrG8ht5T+oPrsfUiUO+uldYChSjY0BbBxj56jCUZZWA rSRXI+MGL7MDYHs2CTidp8ZaxQAypZz8rX98GOhzcH8W/jcTYu3ghQA7/gyIqnJInybc Rf7A==
X-Received: by 10.70.109.205 with SMTP id hu13mr54522222pdb.129.1440497984254; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:c0c8:1001::38? ([2001:420:c0c8:1001::38]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fh10sm13904744pdb.95.2015.08.25.03.19.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Florin Coras <fcoras.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1E6D55F-248D-4E3B-876C-D05C0C382CCE@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:19:39 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D83F8996-B96C-4FE8-BB07-9EE42FE8C8BF@gmail.com>
References: <F6C97F59-9BC7-4AE0-8ADB-DD1ED37101CA@gigix.net> <81BF6E49-8CAE-4A98-8C35-B44BDEE09397@gigix.net> <55DC3513.8060709@lispmob.org> <F1E6D55F-248D-4E3B-876C-D05C0C382CCE@inria.fr>
To: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/1dGsct8olIXe1TdpsBijXEu49i4>
Cc: Joel Halpern <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Standard Track
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:19:46 -0000

I also support the move to ST. 

Florin

> On Aug 25, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am supporting the move to ST and focus to overlay technology in this case.
> 
> Damien Saucez 
> 
> On 25 Aug 2015, at 11:27, Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/25/15 12:07 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> so far only Dino replied to this thread. Should we understand that people are not interested in moving LISP to ST?
>> 
>> I very much support moving LISP to ST, sorry for the delay in replying.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> -Lori
>> 
>>> 
>>> L.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 10 Aug 2015, at 00:02, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> As suggested by Terry Manderson during the last meeting, it is time for the WG 
>>>> to think to move away from the Internet Scalability issue and focus on the core
>>>> protocol technology. 
>>>> 
>>>> LISP has its merits, concerning routing scalability, proved by experimental work 
>>>> documented in the various RFC and drafts that the WG has produced so far. 
>>>> That work remains untouched. Yet, LISP provides advantages and benefits 
>>>> in contexts for which it has not been originally designed.
>>>> 
>>>> It would be worth for the WG to consider dropping the scalability aspects,
>>>> focus on the overlay technology itself, and possibly move the work
>>>> on standard track. 
>>>> 
>>>> If the WG decides to go that way, this will give the opportunity to re-work 
>>>> the core set of RFCs defining LISP, avoiding any reference to scalability,
>>>> and possibly enhancing the documents with the experience gathered so far.
>>>> 
>>>> Would be the WG in favour of such direction?
>>>> 
>>>> Joel & Luigi
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email