IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Standard Track

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 10 August 2015 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFC81A00DC for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWIMjoj0sYDs for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D7F1A009C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbfa8 with SMTP id fa8so35834686pdb.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Mm5rrb3Qbzez1UJHaYCMLcik/opjk4EA3Ktz5jjbnz0=; b=MIs4eQ2Q+wd+QhxwlvXr2WjECImoMLTZdHm2GvbS4hmy2llGNtgW8TSw3mkw2jazkK dJKD696tL36XtI6VRtheQHkwztA2THeT3pFWjJpqZXEpK0RBRm7pnNZsYhYl9USa44rf g7FtjBnWxF50ZO+PxDH8ZAky1qUv1mxZQ41aAA83vJ8mR6OWKsMwflO6m9qRSi59CPWT 2P0QZUt2uSFQKrWUz+K7x1jjEzNi6b5BA1zJq/aCwSk7Mp89YcnzqzOKKAMUo9bR+izZ XqM0HAzJXzEmKHpACI8N1FrZ5Qd7rwjrNqrkMoAa37hRVzdWvqFSTR6wte3P9xzMgYGp wK4g==
X-Received: by 10.70.140.238 with SMTP id rj14mr49823323pdb.38.1439246362411; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.2] ([166.170.37.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lk4sm21310565pab.23.2015.08.10.15.39.20 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F6C97F59-9BC7-4AE0-8ADB-DD1ED37101CA@gigix.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:39:19 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D52940CA-CF8C-4E0F-80E1-3A8D97AC466A@gmail.com>
References: <F6C97F59-9BC7-4AE0-8ADB-DD1ED37101CA@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/4NxkURil-NG5_j3TlJMVU6JadR4>
Cc: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Standard Track
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:39:24 -0000

> It would be worth for the WG to consider dropping the scalability aspects,
> focus on the overlay technology itself, and possibly move the work
> on standard track. 

Could we use different wording rather than “dropping the scalability aspects”. I know you mean to core routing table scalability items. But we don’t want to convey in the charter that for the various overlay use-cases LISP can provide that it won’t scale. That is “scale of the protocol” and “having the protocol solve the Internet scalability problem” are two different and orthongonal items.

And I think LISP should continue to scale the Internet, it just should not be the only or main focus of what LISP can provide.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email