Re: [lisp] Standard Track

Support for ST and overlay focus.

Alberto

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> so far only Dino replied to this thread. Should we understand that people
> are not interested in moving LISP to ST?
>
> L.
>
>
> > On 10 Aug 2015, at 00:02, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As suggested by Terry Manderson during the last meeting, it is time for
> the WG
> > to think to move away from the Internet Scalability issue and focus on
> the core
> > protocol technology.
> >
> > LISP has its merits, concerning routing scalability, proved by
> experimental work
> > documented in the various RFC and drafts that the WG has produced so far.
> > That work remains untouched. Yet, LISP provides advantages and benefits
> > in contexts for which it has not been originally designed.
> >
> > It would be worth for the WG to consider dropping the scalability
> aspects,
> > focus on the overlay technology itself, and possibly move the work
> > on standard track.
> >
> > If the WG decides to go that way, this will give the opportunity to
> re-work
> > the core set of RFCs defining LISP, avoiding any reference to
> scalability,
> > and possibly enhancing the documents with the experience gathered so far.
> >
> > Would be the WG in favour of such direction?
> >
> > Joel & Luigi
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>