Re: [lisp] Adoption of draft-chiappa-lisp-architecture-01 and draft-chiappa-lisp-introduction-01

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Tue, 28 August 2012 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872D211E80E7 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arqgPl1pl3g0 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F6611E810E for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:28:32 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:28:31 -0700
Thread-Topic: [lisp] Adoption of draft-chiappa-lisp-architecture-01 and draft-chiappa-lisp-introduction-01
Thread-Index: Ac15GgyIHLFT3YYGiky+ddstAl9NJgMWskS1
Message-ID: <CC63913F.29AE0%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <CC4ED6F9.2926B%terry.manderson@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3429077311_62498701"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [lisp] Adoption of draft-chiappa-lisp-architecture-01 and draft-chiappa-lisp-introduction-01
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:28:34 -0000

I view that there is consensus in the workgroup to adopt these drafts as
work group items.

Can the authors please submit a revision in the appropriate fashion.

I'd also like to remind the authors that as a WG document I am expecting
that any substantive document changes are the result of WG discussion.

Cheers
Terry

On 13/08/12 4:08 PM, "Terry Manderson" <terry.manderson@icann.org> wrote:

> RE: LISP-Architecture & LISP-Introduction
> 
> As you are aware, in Vancouver the chairs received a request for the
> following documents to be adopted as WG items.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chiappa-lisp-architecture-01
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chiappa-lisp-introduction-01
> 
> I would like to note that these two documents, if adopted, would satisfy the
> following charter item:
> 
> - Architecture description: This document will describe the
> architecture of the entire LISP system, making it easier to read the
> rest of the LISP specifications and providing a basis for discussion
> about the details of the LISP protocols. The document will include
> a description of the cache management and ETR synchronization
> essential characteristics needed to ensure the correct operation
> of the protocol.
> 
> Here starts a 14 day call for adoption, the this call will end on
> Tuesday the 28th August, 2012.
> 
> Please email the WG list stating that you either accept, or not accept, the
> item.
> 
> If you email to support the acceptance of these documents as a WG item,
> please also indicate if you are able and willing to either contribute to, or
> review, (or both) the drafts.
> 
> Sitting in silence does not indicate support, please respond appropriately.
> 
> Cheers
> Terry
>