Re: [lisp] Adoption of draft-chiappa-lisp-architecture-01 and draft-chiappa-lisp-introduction-01

[Ronald Bonica <[e-mail]>]

Hi Noel,

You're right. The introduction document contains references to Section 5.1.1 of the architecture document. Section 5.1.1 of the architecture document talks about exactly the issue that I raised.

So, we are fine as is.

                    Ron

> 
> The "Architectural Perspective" document contains a fairly extensive
> discussion of this issue ("5.1. LISP EIDs").
> 
> There is a warning cross-reference to that discussion in the
> "Introduction"
> document ("3. LISP Overview"), although I do note that that warning is
> not replicated immediately below when the term EID is introduced ("3.1.
> Basic Approach").
> 
> Would people like to see me add an additional warning (and cross-
> reference) at the point at which the term 'EID' is introduced? I don't
> know if it's important enough to disturb the flow of the text, but I
> don't have any significant objection to so doing if it's important
> enough.