Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item

Gregg Schudel <gschudel@cisco.com> Thu, 02 September 2010 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <gschudel@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E693A6886 for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5oEb88gyCa0d for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BA73A6826 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAJ6Xf0yrR7Ht/2dsb2JhbAChAXGjeZwghTsEhEGFWA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,309,1280707200"; d="scan'208";a="357709901"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2010 19:26:19 +0000
Received: from gschudel-mac-2.local ([10.21.166.49]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o82JQI27023377; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 19:26:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4C7FFA95.8090502@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:27:17 -0700
From: Gregg Schudel <gschudel@cisco.com>
Organization: cisco.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lisp@ietf.org, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
References: <C8A53DFC.7011%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <C8A53DFC.7011%terry.manderson@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:25:49 -0000

Hi Terry

I support this draft becoming a WG document. Will contribute/review.


Cheers
gregg



On 9/1/10 6:41 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
> Co-chair hat on.
>
> Folks,
>
> The call for comments on the adoption of this document has closed.
>
> There has only been 3 people supporting adoption of this draft as a work
> group item.
>
> I cannot call consensus based on that response so I am handing this back to
> the authors with the observation that there seemed to be interest from the
> work group in past (both on the ML and at the meetings) in this effort and I
> suggest that the authors of draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning propose
> their ideas via a WG initiated change to the current adopted drafts.
>
> Cheers
> Terry
>
>
> On 17/08/10 10:45 AM, "Terry Manderson"<terry.manderson@icann.org>  wrote:
>
>> Workgroup,
>>
>> The authors of draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-02 have requested for
>> it to be considered as a workgroup item.
>>
>> I am opening a 14 day call for comments on the adoption of this document as
>> a WG item.
>>
>> You will find the ID and past versions at:
>>
>>      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning-02
>>
>> Please email the WG list stating that you either accept, or not accept, the
>> item before Tuesday the 31st of August 2010.
>>
>> If you email to support the acceptance of this document as a WG item, please
>> also indicate if you are able to either contribute to, or review, (or both)
>> the draft.
>>
>> Sitting in silence does not indicate support, please respond appropriately.
>>