Re: [lp-wan] Focused Scope for LPWAN WG at Berlin

[Ana Minaburo <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

Thank you for your input, nevertheless even if the LP-WAN group is created
I believe that the work related to CoRE needs to be done there as
CooL/COMI, CoAP, etc and the work about IPv6 needs to be done in v6OPS but
what we need to do here is to study these problems for LP-WAN and bring
them to the other WG and not to do them here directly. Except for those
items where there is not WG like Header Compression or other.

Thanks
Ana

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Carles Gomez Montenegro <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Ana, all,
>
> I am also in favor of creating a new IETF WG focusing on LPWAN issues.
>
> I think that support/optimization of IPv6 over LPWAN is the core
> functionality required to connect LPWAN devices to the Internet. In this
> area, LPWANs require a solution not as close to the RFC 4944/6282/6775
> suite as the "IPv6 over foo" work done in the 6lo WG. In my opinion, the
> particular LWPAN challenges require going beyond 4944/6282/6775 (even if
> this suite may still be a basis in some aspects). In this regard, I think
> potential WG items could be:
>
>    - Produce "IPv6 over LPWAN: Problem Statement"
>        o  Maybe including a description of upper layer issues as well
>           (e.g. similar to RFC 4919).
>
>    - Produce functionality to support IPv6 over LPWAN. We might define IPv6
>      over foo specifications for the target LPWAN technologies to consider,
>      and/or we might specify rather generic blocks:
>
>        o  "Header Compression for IPv6 datagrams over LPWAN" (covering not
>            only IPv6, but also headers of upper layer protocols such as UDP
>            and CoAP)
>
>        o  "Fragmentation Mechanism for IPv6 over LPWAN"
>
>        o  "IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Adaptation for LPWAN"
>
> There are also end-to-end reliability issues. For example, how should the
> CoAP RTO be configured? Should CoCoA be used in these scenarios?
>
> With regard to management, do the drafts listed below have a home already
> in the CoRE WG?  (Just asking, with the aim to understand which would be
> the best home for this piece of work.)
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Carles
>
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Well in this message I would like to discuss the scope of the WG. We need
> > to define the focused gaps we want to work in. Let's agree about which
> are
> > the subjects we want to study,
> >
> > I think the following points are vey important in order to create the WG,
> > please tell me which other you think we need to add.
> >
> >
> > 1. IPv6
> > draft-gomez-lpwan-ipv6-analysis-00
> > IP End to End Communication
> > IPv6 MTU requires fragmentation
> > ND will be configured in advanced
> >
> > 2. Header Compression
> > draft-toutain-lp-wan-compression-context-00
> > New Mechanism adapted to challenged networks
> >
> > 3.  Security
> > Personal information need to be secured,
> >
> > 4. Management
> > draft-pelov-core-cosol-01
> > draft-veillette-core-cool-01
> > draft-somaraju-core-sid-00
> >
> > Regards
> > Ana
> > _______________________________________________
> > lp-wan mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
> >
>
>
>