Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06

王亚蓉 <wangyr16@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> Mon, 25 March 2024 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <wangyr16@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289A4C14F6A0 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 04:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zs9K2inhA4_i for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 04:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.alumni.sjtu.edu.cn (mail.alumni.sjtu.edu.cn [111.186.59.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE763C14F68D for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 04:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.alumni.sjtu.edu.cn (mail.alumni.sjtu.edu.cn [192.168.1.14]) by mail.alumni.sjtu.edu.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A1A2003E114 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:12:56 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:12:56 +0800
From: 王亚蓉 <wangyr16@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn>
To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1996069984.59504.1711365176017.JavaMail.zimbra@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_eb342020-1662-4a47-8bc3-8d24ce807bd5"
X-Originating-IP: [117.128.51.72]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.5_GA_1894 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF14 (Mac)/8.8.5_GA_1894)
Thread-Index: pb23cmgdNGU1JR7VHAtCjcSZt/rctA==
Thread-Topic: Working Group Adoption Poll for "Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/-BXkmGsajoO2UL0hOX2Fdh5XN58>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:13:14 -0000

Hi Acee&WG, 
I support the adoption of this draft. 
Because similar mechanisms have been added to ISIS (RFC9352) and OSPFv3 (RFC9513). 
Therefore, similar extensions and supplements are also needed for OSPF. 

Thanks, 
Yarong