IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06

Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D2DC14F74E; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EAk6iSI_Zsr1; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C8EC14F6F0; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-430b7b22b17so32413631cf.2; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710945985; x=1711550785; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mT9vxm10gmv2TTfaJgvRar6i6Y7K93DtzWxVc/RpEak=; b=Z3ua26ciUoYbNJbdBN2PN/JGrR911tX1/yNXGDY8kC/IMLo2rboaxzCXvZ/TeagBDZ 85LUltbjwwZJGuWev4VmQVBBrlh5jCYufJNBCpnATjHba+uIiLSGvw9BizdwkEED2qRs 7aCWBsBA+xvgSsAKehisEoNj1gi2XvBCZ9/zIaynnKI2c2epIPHUr6h+OzkaWjHK1Qom idNiovAU4uVoAod4J88qcxSzevwEJKc84YzKtwe5VUkpwVnlx1dXIFrzjEkqRuR84XMy cGHDDaUHv4c5jmOd11T0ojAZ8kAIEBD9KOR0RFsUtvTRxhKgm/c82phoaOoLoYy+ICG+ MVYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710945985; x=1711550785; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mT9vxm10gmv2TTfaJgvRar6i6Y7K93DtzWxVc/RpEak=; b=CeOGv1Y+nbpR2BxzZZ14zCKV12F8CWCoGul1Po1+nn4Ow9grouUL4ogYMWtEhOBrYD FXRTJqUY/JJV/dx4j5FImIFls4raGMsQG6TjZXilOFv2dS+AqjzhVFn1F92qtaAk4ouE 9wPsYrc5UwUbzIOjCpMDtHRG++nww2Ofyc3rxggrruqPGezALN4YehLVgqX9+dXON5uG u1Gazz0ZStrdATupQTqelQZ3BN3klaEBe1Tx9c8CZmU6CDBO1UKMxcLQZigZYAXFDe6m cu0nEEmO8c3seeR2ghz34hJWeMJR9SCdUnnXq09Je8F9awOiCsB/Rv8UkT/CtGXhNYDf TzNw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWKiqp3hKv2geGGk1/YOmB40McbVetI8D3CT9Mn6tk60CKw5aJHr1i8I/A6iTXa6eAPavC/0ZlLZ4yLFykWOw9lPNKGF+zWq91/rTaOAbupP4JGXck=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDDSTttVA0cYm/GX0/Z6jZGh9atH2TW4B5QtUINA3/lPtIiIyB 3xjklzKcM88NLvxcnkl2Sz5jXAHv4necIX17IIOTsUKqX10D4QXB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHrowNp1MtczzUHI9AqO6tcpfLBXLytjaOIFVEE6qjft2gbwzzFD+8GLmjMqTkb11uO8PnuHQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7f45:0:b0:431:1b30:ef56 with SMTP id g5-20020ac87f45000000b004311b30ef56mr108562qtk.3.1710945985486; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2605:a601:918a:7600:b918:3277:cf7b:6edc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1-20020ac84cc1000000b0042f04e421d2sm7510022qtv.24.2024.03.20.07.46.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
From: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fc9a254a5ff8405e88e55a9b61a4140c@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:46:14 -0400
Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag@ietf.org" <draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F94C2512-9D9F-4862-AAE7-FE628DC6E3B7@gmail.com>
References: <F425E082-D008-4565-98AE-98593BF1F391@gmail.com> <fc9a254a5ff8405e88e55a9b61a4140c@huawei.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/IaNPMP0a3YzrbbaAtbz7NAMHac4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:46:27 -0000

Hi Jie,

I asked this when the flag was added to IS-IS and then to OSPFv3. I agree it would be good to know why knowing a prefix is an Anycast address is "useful" when the whole point is that you use the closest one (or some other criteria). 

Thanks,
Acee

> On Mar 20, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi authors,
> 
> I just read this document. Maybe I didn't follow the previous discussion, but it seems in the current version it does not describe how this newly defined flag would be used by the receiving IGP nodes? 
> 
> Best regards,
> Jie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 4:43 AM
> To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06
> 
> 
> This starts the Working Group adoption call for draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag. This is a simple OSPFv2 maintenance draft adding an Anycast flag for IPv4 prefixes to align with IS-IS and OSPFv3. 
> 
> Please send your support or objection to this list before April 6th, 2024. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email