IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Flow Control Discussion for IS-IS Flooding Speed

tony.li@tony.li Wed, 19 February 2020 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E26120948 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:59:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LBjt7PQV2TPP for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:59:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20510120900 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:59:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id w21so623968pgl.9 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:59:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=C/8ya9u1A6ITZ4L9pWTkZcf10kR7KZp96QafpLBObn0=; b=a5P8qLw62/f0POTDDmP8fWDgVJyEFlvz+aHWRwKV/4zV81s+pudN6huB4yHF6InJQW YsE0/qylVpxYDaTJqVoejVTOkVYWl6kSsZhgAvquLqODYtFudmNWOxQ7ofreLKyGeHzn XzUbZYnKJ+jViiEtzFXBd//naJVFKPQHWA3n157C/nZfniyIQk8dN9lny+2apwZlyI1h A8OvkQoDbcJa/u3/dwnatqa3V4Y5zNU1kUQ4k3E4mni3U87Gc4b+jNycjcpqtP6vy/eE 3/yewIJWK+M6CK4euobh6EMe169EG8/GgGWKhybM+sZLu/eHjJ9RpkNKQmyeTUAtDxWM JmmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=C/8ya9u1A6ITZ4L9pWTkZcf10kR7KZp96QafpLBObn0=; b=FVtaNc+tPj6Tijr+NEd6GDOR/gWthIkPcXSWtWuQyDhq07r85EwgHfMP5KGAoGtqxe 9eXEXtAZWzd1Aey+qrC/GdPKPGVqecDCq/uIhdWT5U1fj2VVIAZiRezWPr6E91HsDxfC uwmF8klvIQ59auw5qb7WitK4+t4TEDEz5bgM/38Pe+CWVhomYmvxSRSxMga/blPU5fn/ +55tmSbkhKH1U9dcGqO8BI1Ir9KnASyERlHqSTFMEHCPttMOjQ+SiIYvLcd1hkIHD/DE pLsf/sO0mkrjX1sZXdUb6ctq5NorfP5NXMUZ2scw4pahm26FG/r/b1v5H83vjqhAX2cu owYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVFTSmWNtGf0cCSY/aMqNUP4rmablOxFbDPrfmESKhMm19OtoH6 Ew8ns9eOPTC4rSzJtPZrwts=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJ6ZGrwwDg06lBeDxIgYn16rYR13DF2ttVmqIn/IZOL7hHym+nsfa82mPHUZTHBDFhaxFCfg==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:420c:: with SMTP id c12mr28364346pgq.270.1582142383641; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.128.13.33] ([118.127.110.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x26sm456740pfq.55.2020.02.19.11.59.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: tony.li@tony.li
In-Reply-To: <09b937e6-c32d-416a-5111-e7510660d8d7@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 06:59:39 +1100
Cc: Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A80929A5-32CD-47E8-AC80-2C6C806EBD6D@tony.li>
References: <5b430357-56ad-2901-f5a8-c0678a507293@cisco.com> <4FC90EB2-D355-4DC5-8365-E5FBE037954E@gmail.com> <f5b56713-2a4d-1bf7-8362-df4323675c61@cisco.com> <4D5A06BB-0522-4FB5-B783-4AD7C78F8EC0@tony.li> <09b937e6-c32d-416a-5111-e7510660d8d7@cisco.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/2TswUFZs1YctcPVfg62AIjAXW5Y>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flow Control Discussion for IS-IS Flooding Speed
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:59:51 -0000


> easy to say with a single PD. If you have 20, each with a different architecture, it becomes a different problem.


My employer has multiple PD implementations. I sympathize, but it’s still necessary.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email