IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Flow Control Discussion for IS-IS Flooding Speed

tony.li@tony.li Wed, 19 February 2020 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B10512010D for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:15:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FtwjqCIRKDBL for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15EA2120024 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id p11so9103180plq.10 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:15:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=QyaoCIAmw/lbIrK8eMdNrZdkw6pEGQOfoe97FR0Y0og=; b=JlxIDmxsRhA3EcbD5z7dJqUiQX9oNcexwu0FPrakgOIUJ11avINqeig0W8fp0Q/4Jc qNxqNw1b3AXqpyz1Nk9XkWnKQANfRyzSwph1CRTbjDUxbXCBieyPmYAumAekdgACl8Xc Pyu2L8WifirVQ5IngNBR7Bp7k5tOQvU8uIHW197joPVfATTo8m5Q6KfieTYsPAoPq0zU Fly40n9OhyRGV9JtdQI8r9Ec0AoI5luvJ+HBa2uL0IMZnNj0kTJ3GBtF1+zPCTBHpU3B /sTkdNS8i+Ds7m4t0XTKYJ1rJOpJB3/jocahBrtQMZoZC7Co81volu4OQYC+x8CXMyoF XbVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=QyaoCIAmw/lbIrK8eMdNrZdkw6pEGQOfoe97FR0Y0og=; b=XwreY40QthAZPXx2EaQO0CTiSIJ0WBj/w726UYqA+39mvyP+wtOu1gNqIp3y7D/3nm VM+8iwR84sh9u8ztn+tO53XH1BcRgJHy1hweRqh+abE90smifuEihOhmlOdug/W6OxAK bZ4onvN1jlFYV8lj+d+ZNf1Fb2OoZOxATkDmWM2jfcd1f1zAq1pksJs5rDBVGbX2yIYu LZeYKCTQw4zcKWtGk6Tr0B0Kta72L8IZeNDDb2laGlotjQvliaX3F2bokVw4w+TPXNqB XCHubUXPBq7+qOzfKzlFFEMjDFE5PUFMXE97cHCFycy9k4kUfil4XWjfvGcTGyCsChyW 3pfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW/w4+qOxDqnuFK2C3RVMVvSK40kOKSjPhnZOuU/OUDX0QvLRqp FpH6el0k8pdbljjt8IajmTU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzla3uwJjMyJHLwd9/kVViJhCaHKNpaxnuWDGJlFRMIXHzhmJ2QxkU+B7qDt47DfVOa2s+JAA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b30b:: with SMTP id d11mr7180268pjr.22.1582092935560; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:15:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.95.81.70] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 3sm957089pjg.27.2020.02.18.22.15.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: tony.li@tony.li
Message-Id: <ADAD5324-AE0D-4091-8203-FCA7194092E4@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_61F6C9D8-B6C8-4A07-8CC5-B8BAB76327D1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:15:30 +1100
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB46197D562EB5F213DEA7D08AC1100@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
To: Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com>
References: <MW3PR11MB46191E81D5B22B454D8184A4C1100@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <6549B961-D8B9-462A-94D1-A91AAA454A16@gmail.com> <MW3PR11MB46197D562EB5F213DEA7D08AC1100@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/c8abiGmQ2-71zvWs7mwMV-9vsv8>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flow Control Discussion for IS-IS Flooding Speed
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 06:15:37 -0000

> The TX side flow control is purely based on performance on each interface – there are no implementation requirements imposed or implied as regards the receiver.

Then the LSP transmitter is operating without information from the LSP receiver. Additional information from the receiver can help the transmitter maintain a more accurate picture of reality and adapt to it more quickly.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email