Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-02

Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> Fri, 07 August 2020 06:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764BA3A0A78 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OsEyTFBE_eMY for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BCC3A0A62 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id d22so492381pfn.5 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=/Kkh6mGQQcU2Fs8K9i12quBtxscjKPPUfIP11dMCWlk=; b=hTwed0g6H5byMv0mMG8A69qQ2yW/26oCsugincnJaff4Rd8lzflmNvKjSy16vVyqRF e0Gqj7GuOkjIeUHsjgvbj2HKjPQialz7d6cXlDzKKf+aTj5VipQjoUu/dB9KQh2KyIEq Nl1wBq+u4WYvE9+lCIs2gsJ9ystd+XTtsn3vcr/RaVQZgkcWtkF/oI5kdxw0k4SoRteF IvMuUzHbydhDLlagOqNyQXz3xYoWru/zCOnJSt9c+4aBpIP9W4exF9p1SixAY5SSkx20 U08RsRmnwYnhCk73lu3IZkse+vyGIEUxhWxTY1z2m9DKcoGd4xKL0dIF/rRpK9W6+5qM fdbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=/Kkh6mGQQcU2Fs8K9i12quBtxscjKPPUfIP11dMCWlk=; b=Gdl26F5S/rHkM4FAO4PMagTUmj1Q30fpM4z8r/6f7DNIlpccUF8rVf+XdhhO+v+BuG KKBQmWXETR/gwCnP5+oVkNPenT6RLQsMiWc8i1pQ+AkqObLlvljGiRpfXAG+rEjZ277i F4kzKcR3Jkr61MCCvCRDqO3WO9bp84QFdq4fdippZsHJnLJLU4AAB7i2i4tFuVCDZu9G TjtcjblYjs4+VjbiFyeBIYJ4HT8xuSmHJkPeq2yUoQDMl6Xo7Zx/1fSEyUgc3GUB5Gsd vjyi+D9IxDrrnrdLqNBar91GjlhvSTzaAe0eOOXqZ0lpT5cl4B1y7XeUp7hWJyoWr8TP csjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bovpp9CgmoAA2c+5TgvL/qeX6XsSXvr9bVUxDdyfq4/X76tKx TGYT6xEhfaPBGquF1OYLbghez4sw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx28LCxBSOeTL/kojDVLWBzFk3bFsu6WmHb46jzpecrLra+Oo+7Jt67jNQIfAJOemAVAsGCLw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1d51:: with SMTP id d17mr10102904pgm.162.1596782750637; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.24] (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j198sm11386631pfd.205.2020.08.06.23.45.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <40E7470A-E21F-4D32-A69E-CB54A40C7200@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3FBE8B48-7767-49C8-875A-45D12559594C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:45:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB433791EF6DA1D8607514870CC1490@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
To: Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com>
References: <32323_1596545126_5F295866_32323_118_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48F0BB30@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BY5PR11MB43375CB413060250B336BE64C14A0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <4558_1596554251_5F297C0B_4558_298_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48F0C59B@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <95A83DB0-A58C-4BD5-AF0B-8EF49D20EB3A@gmail.com> <89F6F8E5-E11D-4A6E-A783-8C9384FE3A1A@cisco.com> <BY5PR11MB4337DB5B017781522AAF9E66C14B0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <824DFF9C-56E4-4E4F-A249-2E9413D85CC4@gmail.com> <BY5PR11MB4337E1A347464FAD04591D97C14B0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <2F899EBA-A1F2-4CC5-926C-7215A861E5D7@gmail.com> <BY5PR11MB43378C1841C07A51490A81FBC1480@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <B12E746E-BF84-4D47-98E5-29CB7A95E026@gmail.com> <BY5PR11MB43373267859238F25FCB4F10C1480@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <165FB9F3-1CD8-40B1-B3B8-FE7EAF362156@gmail.com> <BY5PR11MB433791EF6DA1D8607514870CC1490@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/5LR2hfgXM9YANftubbAZ_Q1222s>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-02
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:45:52 -0000

Hi Les,

> 1)Invent a new type of SID which is associated with an area.
> In this case some variation of encodings defined in V2 of the draft are appropriate.


But these aren’t backward compatible, which operators clearly want.

 
> 2)Use a reachable address to get to the area. That address could be the node address of the current Area Leader or an anycast address shared by all IERs.


Either of these is fine by me.  Do others care?


> IN which case existing prefix SID advertisement is appropriate coupled with a means of identifying the address. There are two proposed encodings for that.


And here we haven’t come to agreement.  Do others have a preference?

Tony