IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Fri, 24 August 2018 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3951F130E10 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dFa84_PaGM7e for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05750130E0F for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=724; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1535126949; x=1536336549; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FyCTNx7YvRnlKSlSHIPmS8ZtYjc4S3jwqC+fGZS+3BI=; b=igEgz7eZaqNwNbe1KmCcaJzQsIE3xarmuu26VfmdzidE3TBhhwudT5L5 51iwm+dkVmuQKGuBmOQyyBLHdddF0QGb/46ygfBQj3SsVh/szpq8du/XF oJyhu8zeRgoesl7HK5CxE77TwzI6Zha15xItoSWyXfNzrRCfYGNN0VGv8 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C8AwBbLIBb/xbLJq1bHAEBAQQBAQoBAYUhEiiMW41PmBwLhGwCgzE4FAECAQECAQECbRwMhTcBAQEDAThAARALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUTAQUCAQGFFwilCg6Ea4V8iTeBQT+Ddi6FS4ULAo1WhH6ITwmPbxeIQoYBk0SBWCGBUjMaCBsVO4JpiUeHDj0wj2gBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,283,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="6080123"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Aug 2018 16:09:07 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.53] (ams-ppsenak-nitro4.cisco.com [10.60.140.53]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7OG96p0004668; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:09:06 GMT
Message-ID: <5B802DA2.4010208@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:09:06 +0200
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tony.li@tony.li
CC: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <8F5D2891-2DD1-4E51-9617-C30FF716E9FB@cisco.com> <C64E476F-1C00-435E-9C74-BEC3053377E8@gmail.com> <2F5FDB3F-ADCA-4DB4-83DA-D2BC3129D2F2@gmail.com> <5B7E78DD.90302@cisco.com> <172728E8-49E6-4F43-9356-815E1F4C22E7@gmail.com> <5B7FCAB3.6040600@cisco.com> <3D1DEC37-ACE7-4412-BB2E-4C441A4E7455@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <3D1DEC37-ACE7-4412-BB2E-4C441A4E7455@tony.li>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.53, ams-ppsenak-nitro4.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/EkuaATORcr93jIFoqe-cpy2gulw>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:09:12 -0000

Hi Tony,

On 24/08/18 17:03 , tony.li@tony.li wrote:
>
> So, going Old Skool here:
>
> Since everyone agrees that this is a reasonable direction, how about we have a real discussion on the list?
>
> Requirement number 1 is straightforward: a significant reduction in flooding overhead.
>
> The basis for this requirement is the understanding that in a dense topology, there is a great deal of redundancy due to flooding, and that it is this redundancy that supersaturates the control plane.
>
> Do we agree on this?

absolutely.

I would add that the flooding reduction should not add significant delay 
to the flooding time compared to the regular flooding case.

thanks,
Peter

>
> Tony
>
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email