IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward

tony.li@tony.li Fri, 24 August 2018 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8730A130DC5 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lnRhzyWxknEz for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381081286E3 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id t14-v6so4441971pgf.0 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+UaTc26qbp3sxGI15aV4P1Op7Ru+ScF89wpwEixr+zk=; b=PRws1m2Ah0eT8ml0VcFuJP/XVlxaGalhXPx5MbcYZDIm/ctmogX35K3IyK+V0mZIub 1XN8yx2bM5qaGfu3RLa2QlD5heLBLUGGFSa2lGiTvfjME07BeZPeQUTRXPcu6OrAhRfQ R5x83h4CckmYl0oUnNG2j7UZYRaF5lNXxRZgfMbbg06hiq4Ahy0XMNoStH3VSjek+nBm WCZ6lklP/4gN/rDCQKRQl14YjQIp4lRzzDZfT/RDjnDoZDa2tpfAmeRjbVVYn/dpFBb4 fOB54CC1WUiVy2qJ3WFk0lFAdnIU63/SfLckT6alN4s9wLxeF9adQKCfnGtx9ceuP/ip ymOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+UaTc26qbp3sxGI15aV4P1Op7Ru+ScF89wpwEixr+zk=; b=oHLHPLnasynbdw2JTruCygDGJ1mRpimXrsAJewVLe6LYtNhE4j+bO9c4C4DY/YRPL9 VmpYXhP4+rqct/xKfECKrbHgox/iAXW7CNz60mkj32oHE9StNaEZZf3hQhBK1+dea+Jm 7oMRauL3oFUhrZxkXl8QgeECYjj18tIkPzEPjZ0XzccraKgms6JKWnm0KfEEP/FBQ3rA CLunRBAeMrLtldz2bU2ut3rDqt0AUlfYGqZALksaiKnYQRFC1PALBIiAbSTBNSedNbA8 Qj/TU7Otxaiq8qhn16Jy1Qsnq+yj08JzpBKGvsvEsuVwX4N669Oj2f7BRLHDAQ2H6Xx4 AIZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51ApuGITcU1z1YlRZlmwKAmVZm2NMnBdtX4BtycmeaOMEQoAMudq VOqK9BPCfgUusAokf9r67WZ9l1ln
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbLlfdCtjDiwcS/K2nLSztDAtHfcB4qHB3QIYoZQ1DLkT4HZKYJYNIccV2loE/g1l1ZmhfP8Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:b4f:: with SMTP id t76-v6mr2386398pfi.36.1535123023664; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.228.216] ([162.210.130.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11-v6sm15163647pfi.4.2018.08.24.08.03.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: tony.li@tony.li
In-Reply-To: <5B7FCAB3.6040600@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:03:41 -0700
Cc: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3D1DEC37-ACE7-4412-BB2E-4C441A4E7455@tony.li>
References: <8F5D2891-2DD1-4E51-9617-C30FF716E9FB@cisco.com> <C64E476F-1C00-435E-9C74-BEC3053377E8@gmail.com> <2F5FDB3F-ADCA-4DB4-83DA-D2BC3129D2F2@gmail.com> <5B7E78DD.90302@cisco.com> <172728E8-49E6-4F43-9356-815E1F4C22E7@gmail.com> <5B7FCAB3.6040600@cisco.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Um4Hk4EHkeBcKCkty_sbzHvEidk>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:03:46 -0000

So, going Old Skool here:

Since everyone agrees that this is a reasonable direction, how about we have a real discussion on the list?

Requirement number 1 is straightforward: a significant reduction in flooding overhead.

The basis for this requirement is the understanding that in a dense topology, there is a great deal of redundancy due to flooding, and that it is this redundancy that supersaturates the control plane.

Do we agree on this?

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email