IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Fri, 24 August 2018 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FF8130DBE for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4XkH_9e52Mhu for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1133E12F1AC for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1548; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1535127430; x=1536337030; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=jqL+/t3oYBrgLDIk0FNKDwE/37cLnuCVT8rKI58b5QE=; b=djcBQNeQEo0DBRW0iq+YfHt0KecNl5kqkwXX0KIc/f1O8WsBMIdwbna+ fcAx3FbbxZKa026et62g2YCOVLyJWPJKcdjfAx3Pu33sIRGQMwk9/i/i5 dZaJx/FN3kO2k6NZATVFdh3uFxXPSesy9jqbabYEpfQEgz+N04MhS7XG+ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CbAAB8LoBb/4MNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNPZX8oCotyjCGCDYhTjU+BegsYC4RJAoMQITQYAQIBAQIBAQJtHAyFNwEBAQQBATg0CwwEAgEIEQQBAQEeECEGCx0IAgQBDQUIgxqBaQMVD6UPhykNgywFiSAXgUE/gRKCZC6CVkUBAQKHNwKaeCsJAoxdgwgfjkOLfIchAhEUgSQdOIFScBU7gmmJR4FOhT5vAY5LgRwBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,283,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="161479632"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Aug 2018 16:17:09 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w7OGH998007739 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:17:09 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:17:08 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:17:08 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tony.li@tony.li" <tony.li@tony.li>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward
Thread-Index: AQHUOZzx1fG+ry0N80OZf0oWOKvmqqTMSsQAgAAEEQCAARKngIAA6SIAgACpmoCAAGOpgIAAEkcA//+thfA=
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:17:08 +0000
Message-ID: <e74cef3014db4e1a86a5fe0d7b833afa@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <8F5D2891-2DD1-4E51-9617-C30FF716E9FB@cisco.com> <C64E476F-1C00-435E-9C74-BEC3053377E8@gmail.com> <2F5FDB3F-ADCA-4DB4-83DA-D2BC3129D2F2@gmail.com> <5B7E78DD.90302@cisco.com> <172728E8-49E6-4F43-9356-815E1F4C22E7@gmail.com> <5B7FCAB3.6040600@cisco.com> <3D1DEC37-ACE7-4412-BB2E-4C441A4E7455@tony.li> <5B802DA2.4010208@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5B802DA2.4010208@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.93.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/rKiszD0ZEb_-7S1jzwJELsqOb5E>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:17:12 -0000

Building on what Tony L and Peter have already stated:

R1: Significant reduction in flooding overhead.

R2: Flooding reduction should not add significant delay to the flooding time

R3: Reliability of flooding MUST be maintained

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Peter Psenak
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 9:09 AM
> To: tony.li@tony.li
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; Acee Lindem
> (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward
> 
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 24/08/18 17:03 , tony.li@tony.li wrote:
> >
> > So, going Old Skool here:
> >
> > Since everyone agrees that this is a reasonable direction, how about we
> have a real discussion on the list?
> >
> > Requirement number 1 is straightforward: a significant reduction in
> flooding overhead.
> >
> > The basis for this requirement is the understanding that in a dense
> topology, there is a great deal of redundancy due to flooding, and that it is
> this redundancy that supersaturates the control plane.
> >
> > Do we agree on this?
> 
> absolutely.
> 
> I would add that the flooding reduction should not add significant delay to
> the flooding time compared to the regular flooding case.
> 
> thanks,
> Peter
> 
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > .
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email