Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward

tony.li@tony.li Fri, 24 August 2018 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8937130DDA for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uy0iA6KSBSRv for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C80F130DE9 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id m3-v6so3860276pgp.6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=E8ypffEV+WfYSGRJHXRjzSG4kEdY9XwVWUNLGz6zYIU=; b=REiiySayvodg8vm1Ryre6QcWpCW2SHFHKpOapHc1IBLz/nc+RN5ldqgSCa+zniO+7x rvSYSfnoGBamVY87+VQ2qNd9Ywe0kQQ4k4kq0Q+LkjmBZF+Fxmiyvi5+GIQ9eVVuWWvx y3x+SUJ2/+U0a9hPzeoUwSZKUPQdEGFTExMcj2qzwDlKeKGIy4IJCg04dpeeO/834OB5 SsLDAo0t2gEVBB+PPdcGnoN5YrjUKIG/hNHEhm+dRATjjtorfjI0nIN53DJVggs67Byq hZxJ7Jd7rf6t1EDNxAbvTzjHC28tddrFwAlrq5Qk1SVZbELlEU8opTxc5dIX6TcW4n9l 1Tsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=E8ypffEV+WfYSGRJHXRjzSG4kEdY9XwVWUNLGz6zYIU=; b=fpSCEqeeR7/+JAWmV2muV4S0mr4aUDaWmpFgquxz4YzeGywDXBAtNvSW3GlKBfm7Bx Z5NcSrJ49XkP2bSCr4sUx+/VgLrmz8j1YREbRD52au3lo5qo8Pf5fINYRdLHRE16L4fS jdP7exbtTN/HP0jTJ5WMqKgGZvxNLv7kZw91ThGIJxSMtBKBPtpqJen8J1rSuicp0QAt IV5Elsj/pXmy5M4nuidH6xVAvfvGaFNjKIzniyQi4eUCLlMw+/PqyrDazbQpfj7ZRTXT iDXFDBFGQFQnua3itaLfj5TwEW6aAMowPv6LHo2R0g0+KX0XsfBn8Hktz7LnV0k+JyNQ vq+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CbL4VGdQuAKpGHiN3/9lMMMboe4hAkLYN7tHU9QTVT8y6QO9nU vbr02qxEV/nAYbQ96rMLEHg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYAMtFGexr5n5yzjJghDUcQVSqD98h8QOY3RfbZa7rJ4jO7cbP7Dus5nvWHGRMGKCmbYKvMhQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:d74f:: with SMTP id w15-v6mr3017790pgi.306.1535141771232; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.228.216] ([162.210.130.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u30-v6sm9886678pgk.66.2018.08.24.13.16.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: tony.li@tony.li
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHHYyGNFk1YhsXOiu2P6XhHVrQyL2aGD4HXqE6tYjw4=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:16:09 -0700
Cc: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, lsr@ietf.org, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <899DADE7-FED5-4702-B926-34EA6756D7B6@tony.li>
References: <8F5D2891-2DD1-4E51-9617-C30FF716E9FB@cisco.com> <C64E476F-1C00-435E-9C74-BEC3053377E8@gmail.com> <2F5FDB3F-ADCA-4DB4-83DA-D2BC3129D2F2@gmail.com> <5B7E78DD.90302@cisco.com> <172728E8-49E6-4F43-9356-815E1F4C22E7@gmail.com> <5B7FCAB3.6040600@cisco.com> <3D1DEC37-ACE7-4412-BB2E-4C441A4E7455@tony.li> <CCF220A3-8308-47B8-8CC6-1989705FF05C@cisco.com> <CA+wi2hNv8AVyR81LRmJ=Pd5_p5rS2djCOjY9YDgKxG=KEO_MkA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMHHYyGNFk1YhsXOiu2P6XhHVrQyL2aGD4HXqE6tYjw4=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/upu7ykbx0At9WKh1brHc9myoP34>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 20:16:14 -0000


> On Aug 24, 2018, at 10:36 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> 
> Do we really need for DC use case to have flooding reduction standardized for all three protocols ? ISIS, OSPFv2 & OSPFv3 ? Would just focusing on ISIS not be sufficient ? 


Eventually, yes.  It’s clear that we’re not going to get people to change their IGP just for this.  So, in the spirit of glasnost, why not fix ‘em all at once?

Tony