Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

tony.li@tony.li Mon, 17 August 2020 23:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B613A1484; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7OsaaG6A79DD; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BED3A146E; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id 17so9028598pfw.9; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=V5j1j/WQUWRexg0pFuzPuzVeV2r2RKMLDkv5r/TOprQ=; b=h8hW8Q78WE+J217x91cfBxHbfdoD+VKEAnAdoOBxMvF7nsbiw3hTcFkOXH4w0rwMVs nMffCZbSDC+pU29XHD4bLAHTZFY6hhpJWCN7zR2xYOYpL9SAfLIZ0xwEZ1VI90EAUQmc i+e060Wik4R8JLcdaK7bl0+p09RuC71VNUmRdUxitTnh0nfH7n/VhZN/nRZs56rBU5m0 TNP0sMruSDQvy4DRDbvvyQxeZqMhm4uGLqwcrUwVjSwU2BwNVba99ZosOdIAXaToKrE0 WII65U8/MfA3P4QZqReHArvtzapPb1HdIN3bOWzHWexNIKdcDndVMrd37cuCqCW6Mnc7 FTMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=V5j1j/WQUWRexg0pFuzPuzVeV2r2RKMLDkv5r/TOprQ=; b=S+QebGTos4jj2BOiAlLrql8M0FhD5WKZbPovDC4HvYman9C5r5BzIgfTHdYZ2XxSgZ VckTZW9TP8zE+PcigC4AdTdl3qWk04NpxNj+mti4K+AxoKWyng0AhfaCwjUpLWN2sVZz 5nR8WgHeCBakACeRLWIsWsZ0PFLocfiYgy+e5IDXauuPTAyMWSc94S1ZXi5eOVFWPj37 ZQDgTNoVFSQ6HN2SgGlQyyOYNjOuNnMAJGFbEny26pP+JYTnYjFWqup6GIqpbcyjuJI3 4KiJQ7CN1EE1DxMTMLpVAZ/j7y2DWZlrU0JlqNzvSRI8/gb4bS8R/zQaj4PymXad3NYX INNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xA+Dasca/1dR+FVGc1keTEfXBMDeccaa7gfhEtFHojI3PTdVR x2hwkbFoL+C6j/QbriJ9rAw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdRc5CEgU075VfKJxAq3BvrJMGL08LUSoki0YQEbfGE6yAR0/CJQLCgcYOkZyZDV11hd40xw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:f00a:: with SMTP id k10mr11626531pgh.76.1597708067825; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.95.82.254] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l12sm18912928pjq.31.2020.08.17.16.47.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: tony.li@tony.li
In-Reply-To: <9094873B-3A03-4F48-B438-55AB0CA75396@chopps.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:47:46 -0700
Cc: lsr@ietf.org, lsr-ads@ietf.org, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E9DF9CDA-D031-4995-BB69-7A9CEE312707@tony.li>
References: <9094873B-3A03-4F48-B438-55AB0CA75396@chopps.org>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/pUDP-T58ZZTPP92uxNDFJR5HxJM>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 23:47:51 -0000


> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after September 1st, 2020, for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
> 
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/



Hi,

I’d like to raise an objection.

Recently, I requested (and I thought that Peter agreed to) a clarification of the Min Unidirectional Link Delay.

As of version -08, the draft references RFC 7810 for the Metric-type in Section 5.1.  

That RFC defines both a “Unidirectional Link Delay” (section 4.1) and “Min/Max Unidirectional Link Delay” (section 4.2).

I requested that the reference be extended to specify the section.

Instead, as of -09, the reference has been changed to refer to ietf-isis-te-app.  This is somewhat helpful becuase it makes it clear that this should be found
in the Application Specific Link Attributes Sub-TLV, but it still does not resolve the ambiguity of which sub-sub-TLV should be used.

I would again request that this be clarified.  Proposed text:

	1: Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in [RFC 7810], section 4.2, encoded in the Application Specific Link Attributes Sub-TLV [I-D.ietf-isis-te-app].


Thank you.

Regards,
Tony