IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Re: Identifying script (or global) variants

Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Tue, 20 February 2007 06:52 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJOru-000518-BJ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:52:54 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJOrt-00050y-Uj for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:52:53 -0500
Received: from scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.251.194]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJOrs-0006Xp-4z for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:52:53 -0500
Received: from scmse1.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse1 [133.2.253.16]) by scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id l1K6qoIS000688 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:52:50 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (133.2.206.133) by scmse1.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp via smtp id 65c4_fb1c9e02_c0ae_11db_83dc_0014221fa3c9; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:52:50 +0900
X-AuthUser: duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received: from Tanzawa.it.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.210.1]:40544) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S79E4B> for <ltru@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:51:54 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20070220155007.04e771c0@localhost>
X-Sender: duerst@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:52:31 +0900
To: Martin Hosken <martin_hosken@sil.org>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Identifying script (or global) variants
In-Reply-To: <45DA9682.6000500@sil.org>
References: <E1HI4tO-0004n8-Qa@megatron.ietf.org> <005901c752c1$3f5fb0b0$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <45DA54A0.3080007@sil.org> <30b660a20702191759x505570f2jbf307e1581294a35@mail.gmail.com> <45DA9682.6000500@sil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

At 15:34 07/02/20, Martin Hosken wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>I realise I may have slipped in 2 questions here that I was after
>asking. In addition to knowing which order variants can occur, I'm also
>not sure whether Latn is required since en has a Latn suppress script on
>it. Does adding fonipa require that the Latn reappear or can it remain
>suppressed?

Thinking purely semantically, I think Latn can be even more supressed
once fonipa is added :-). In other words, Latn might be suppressed, even
on lanugages that otherwise don't suppress it, when fonipa is added.
As an example, sr (assuming it means Serbian) would definitely need
sr-Latn to say it's written in Latin, but sr-fonipa would be as good
as sr-Latn-fonipa because fonipa implies Latn.

Regards,     Martin.


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email