IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 11 December 2007 16:28 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J27xj-0003pR-Vx; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:28:03 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J27xi-0003pG-Kq for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:28:02 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J27xi-0003p8-Az for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:28:02 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J27xg-0003sq-8b for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:28:02 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D79421C0125; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:27:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18E41C00FA; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:27:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB5D58EBE5; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:27:59 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:27:59 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
Message-ID: <20071211162759.GA14556@nic.fr>
References: <BAY132-W9302DA377F096391875C191680@phx.gbl> <p0624080ec37f78f50b65@192.168.1.126> <003501c83931$711bfee0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <p06240812c37f98295b9f@192.168.1.126> <20071211121448.GA15365@nic.fr> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E52A6F75@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <30b660a20712110749j30acdd83ue90a532b6b551660@mail.gmail.com> <20071211161755.GB12784@nic.fr> <30b660a20712110824w7f32d24cp89bdd305b8641cf7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <30b660a20712110824w7f32d24cp89bdd305b8641cf7@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:24:32AM -0800,
 Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org> wrote 
 a message of 43 lines which said:

> In general, the more guidance we can provide reviewers, the more
> defensible their actions become.

We should ask the current Language Subtag Reviewer but I was under the
impression that he does not want to have too much micro-management of
its actions?

> where it does make sense to provide better wording on what kinds of
> things are intended for registration and what not, the better off we
> are.

I agree with the general goal (being precise and transparent) but I
dispute the fact that "vanity subtags" are a serious problem, worth of
an addition to the RFC.



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email