IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manet-dt] Re: PacketBB

"Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@nokia.com> Wed, 28 March 2007 16:13 UTC

Return-path: <manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWalm-0004kb-Em; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:13:06 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWall-0004jS-Ep; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:13:05 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWalj-0007yT-OE; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:13:05 -0400
Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.213]) by mgw-ext13.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l2SGCowU013664; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:12:59 +0300
Received: from daebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.111]) by esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:12:33 +0300
Received: from daebe101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.113]) by daebh101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:12:22 -0500
Received: from [10.162.85.153] ([10.162.85.153]) by daebe101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:12:22 -0500
Message-ID: <460A93DE.90409@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:12:14 -0700
From: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@nokia.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ext Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: [Manet-dt] Re: PacketBB
References: <019c01c76d85$0e6904f0$165cfa84@SEXTANT><4607DBF4.8060608@nokia.com><963155AB-4ECA-4082-96CE-1A003636C9E3@gmail.com> <460A8AA7.8090006@nokia.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A101774841@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A101774841@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2007 16:12:23.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[DE801A30:01C77153]
X-eXpurgate-Category: 1/0
X-eXpurgate-ID: 149371::070328191259-35060BB0-17CD7223/0-0/0-1
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Cc: manet <manet@ietf.org>, manet-dt@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org

Hello Fred,

O.K.  I will try to be careful to avoid the
undesirable results you mentioned.  What
do you think about Romain's proposal?

Regards,
Charlie P.


ext Templin, Fred L wrote:
>> My goal would be to save some substantial packet size in the average
>> case.
>>     
>
> But can you do this without loss of generality?
>
> FWIW, I advocated a TLV approach for packet encoding a
> long time ago but was beaten back by forces that preferred
> efficiency above all. If you're not careful, what you end
> up with is a proprietary solution and/or limited domain of
> applicability.
>
> Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>   


_______________________________________________
Manet-dt mailing list
Manet-dt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email