IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Manet-dt] Re: PacketBB

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 28 March 2007 15:45 UTC

Return-path: <manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWaLX-0001pl-ME; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:45:59 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWaLX-0001pc-2W; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:45:59 -0400
Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com ([130.76.32.69] helo=blv-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWaLU-0004CY-QD; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:45:59 -0400
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (stl-av-01.boeing.com [192.76.190.6]) by blv-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/TEST_SMTPIN) with ESMTP id l2SFjrwT004545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id l2SFjqMq015496; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:45:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwbh-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.55.84]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id l2SFjWUi014314; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:45:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.54.35]) by XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:45:43 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Manet-dt] Re: PacketBB
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:45:42 -0700
Message-ID: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A101774841@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <460A8AA7.8090006@nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Manet-dt] Re: PacketBB
Thread-Index: AcdxTmxFM1Bmx7MgSNiGtkIb+2oaYwAAP5Dg
References: <019c01c76d85$0e6904f0$165cfa84@SEXTANT><4607DBF4.8060608@nokia.com><963155AB-4ECA-4082-96CE-1A003636C9E3@gmail.com> <460A8AA7.8090006@nokia.com>
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins@nokia.com>, ext Ian Chakeres <ian.chakeres@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2007 15:45:43.0707 (UTC) FILETIME=[25190EB0:01C77150]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: manet <manet@ietf.org>, manet-dt@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: manet-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: MANET Design Team <manet-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/manet-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:manet-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt>, <mailto:manet-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: manet-dt-bounces@ietf.org

> My goal would be to save some substantial packet size in the average
> case.

But can you do this without loss of generality?

FWIW, I advocated a TLV approach for packet encoding a
long time ago but was beaten back by forces that preferred
efficiency above all. If you're not careful, what you end
up with is a proprietary solution and/or limited domain of
applicability.

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

_______________________________________________
Manet-dt mailing list
Manet-dt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email