Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same concept

"Charles E. Perkins" <charliep@computer.org> Fri, 11 April 2014 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <charliep@computer.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D031A0392 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ol_1Ll63N-NZ for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64591A02F4 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [99.51.72.196] (helo=[192.168.1.81]) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <charliep@computer.org>) id 1WYkyC-0003rx-BE; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:34:52 -0400
Message-ID: <53487C1A.6060401@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:34:50 -0700
From: "Charles E. Perkins" <charliep@computer.org>
Organization: Blue Skies
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>, manet@ietf.org
References: <061.04d6856ca1d9c40a9ad288f003eeb91f@trac.tools.ietf.org> <CADnDZ89bR74RG0pw7=n0qEFGzjSH0gUNhMQUve7=A+YxG5q=oQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ89bR74RG0pw7=n0qEFGzjSH0gUNhMQUve7=A+YxG5q=oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080204050506080704040100"
X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956d5d4673fe7faad86d37fc16362e621d2b996a98a4e8fa243350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 99.51.72.196
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/-TCiMke1IOvZi3mp7aJ9YTZQVcc
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same concept
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 23:35:17 -0000

Hello folks,

PktSource means the source of the packet that triggered
the RERR.  It could be renamed to be "RERR_Dest", since the
RERR is being sent to the source of the packet that triggered
the RERR.

"active sources" are those actively sending data.  I will make
a new definition for this.

Regards,
Charlie P.


On 4/4/2014 1:32 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> IMHO, MANET has more concepts depending on the network use and status. 
> Therefore it is good that this work considers many use cases.
>
> On Thursday, April 3, 2014, manet issue tracker wrote:
>
>     #22: Multiple terms for same concept
>
>      (Thomas Clausen) While we are on that, I notice that "active
>     source" is
>      used; I am not sure what that is vs a "source" and vs a !PktSource. 
>
>
> It is clear in MANET that active node means there is sleep period 
> within that node, so when the node is out of that period it is active.
>
>     A
>      source is someone who generates data traffic, I would suspect ...
>     so an
>      active source is....what?  Or, is a source someone who can, but
>     doesn't,
>      generate data traffic? 
>
>
> The source is a node that generates data. The active node is a node 
> that generates data for some determined period of times, and does not 
> receive/generate within sleeping periods.
>
>      if so, what is the significance of that wrt.
>      routing protocol operation? And, wrt a /reactive/ routing
>     protocol, which
>      I would assume constructs routes only for active
>     source-destination pairs?
>
>
> I don't think that is correct. In MANET we say it MAY have LLN 
> nodes so it is good AODVv2 considers LLNs scenarios. The ROLL WG have 
> done a terminology RFC, I will try to continue the Manet terminology 
> draft. The routing in LLNs and MANETs does construct routes not only 
> for active source-destination pairs, but routes that have multihops 
> with sleep periods as well.
>
> AB

-- 
Regards,
Charlie P.