Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same concept
"manet issue tracker" <trac+manet@trac.tools.ietf.org> Tue, 23 December 2014 22:28 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+manet@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509FF1A877F for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:28:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xaETXNHz36hC for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4CA1A8764 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:44994 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+manet@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1Y3Xvr-0000P4-Ft; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:27:59 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: manet issue tracker <trac+manet@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: charliep@computer.org
X-Trac-Project: manet
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:27:59 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/manet/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/manet/trac/ticket/22#comment:2
Message-ID: <076.13edd42c39804fba61f5eb7e59d039ea@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <061.04d6856ca1d9c40a9ad288f003eeb91f@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 22
In-Reply-To: <061.04d6856ca1d9c40a9ad288f003eeb91f@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: charliep@computer.org, manet@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+manet@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/65ju5DLnewEHCk0fDpE7AKcZr9k
Cc: manet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same concept
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: manet@ietf.org
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:28:01 -0000
#22: Multiple terms for same concept Changes (by charliep@computer.org): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: On 4/4/2014 1:32 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > IMHO, MANET has more concepts depending on the network use and status. Therefore it is good that this work considers many use cases. > > On Thursday, April 3, 2014, manet issue tracker wrote: > > #22: Multiple terms for same concept > > (Thomas Clausen) While we are on that, I notice that "active source" is > used; I am not sure what that is vs a "source" and vs a !PktSource. > > It is clear in MANET that active node means there is sleep period within that node, so when the node is out of that period it is active. > > A > source is someone who generates data traffic, I would suspect ... so an > active source is....what? Or, is a source someone who can, but doesn't, > generate data traffic? > > The source is a node that generates data. The active node is a node that generates data for some determined period of times, and does not receive/generate within sleeping periods. > > > if so, what is the significance of that wrt. > routing protocol operation? And, wrt a /reactive/ routing protocol, which > I would assume constructs routes only for active source-destination pairs? > > I don't think that is correct. In MANET we say it MAY have LLN nodes so it is good AODVv2 considers LLNs scenarios. The ROLL WG have done a terminology RFC, I will try to continue the Manet terminology draft. The routing in LLNs and MANETs does construct routes not only for active source-destination pairs, but routes that have multihops with sleep periods as well. ============================================================================ On 4/5/2014 5:46 AM, Thomas Clausen wrote: > On 04 Apr 2014, at 22:32, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote: >> IMHO, MANET has more concepts depending on the network use and status. Therefore it is good that this work considers many use cases. >> >> On Thursday, April 3, 2014, manet issue tracker wrote: >> >> #22: Multiple terms for same concept >> >> (Thomas Clausen) While we are on that, I notice that "active source" is >> used; I am not sure what that is vs a "source" and vs a !PktSource. >> >> It is clear in MANET that active node means there is sleep period within that node, so when the node is out of that period it is active. > That is not clear to me. Where is that described in more details? How does it work in a reactive protocol, what if a router is "sleeping" when it receives a RREQ? Does it require global coordination of duty cycles in the network? If not, why not? >> >> A >> source is someone who generates data traffic, I would suspect ... so an >> active source is....what? Or, is a source someone who can, but doesn't, >> generate data traffic? >> >> The source is a node that generates data. The active node is a node that generates data for some determined period of times, and does not receive/generate within sleeping periods. >> >> >> if so, what is the significance of that wrt. >> routing protocol operation? And, wrt a /reactive/ routing protocol, which >> I would assume constructs routes only for active source- destination pairs? >> >> I don't think that is correct. > You do not think that it is correct, that a reactive protocol constructs routes only for active source-destination pairs? >> In MANET we say it MAY have LLN nodes so it is good AODVv2 considers LLNs scenarios. The ROLL WG have done a terminology RFC, I will try to continue the Manet terminology draft. The routing in LLNs and MANETs does construct routes not only for active source-destination pairs, but routes that have multihops with sleep periods as well. > I am at a loss, what does that mean? ============================================================================ On 4/11/2014 4:34 PM, Charles E. Perkins wrote: > PktSource means the source of the packet that triggered > the RERR. It could be renamed to be "RERR_Dest", since the > RERR is being sent to the source of the packet that triggered > the RERR. > > "active sources" are those actively sending data. I will make > a new definition for this. ============================================================================ On 5/28/2014 11:09 AM, Charlie Perkins wrote: > It turns out to be quite straightforward to revise the text > so that the term "active source" is not needed. So, I don't > need to make a definition for this term. -- -----------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: charliep@computer.org | Owner: charliep@computer.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: aodvv2 | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -----------------------------------+------------------------------------ Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/manet/trac/ticket/22#comment:2> manet <http://tools.ietf.org/manet/>
- [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same con… manet issue tracker
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… Thomas Clausen
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… Charlie Perkins
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… manet issue tracker
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… manet issue tracker