Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same concept
Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> Wed, 28 May 2014 18:09 UTC
Return-Path: <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335131A6F04 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 11:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79oM4XiHLo6H for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60321A6F02 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 11:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=KWrhVfryT4GEpeFmJ7JPavaAT8kND3ue4zezyPEjrpX5OwGaV65wDe86hMI3jrbJ; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [107.1.141.74] (helo=[192.168.252.251]) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>) id 1WpiHr-0007z6-J2; Wed, 28 May 2014 14:09:15 -0400
Message-ID: <53862649.7020108@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:09:13 -0700
From: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: manet@ietf.org
References: <061.04d6856ca1d9c40a9ad288f003eeb91f@trac.tools.ietf.org> <CADnDZ89bR74RG0pw7=n0qEFGzjSH0gUNhMQUve7=A+YxG5q=oQ@mail.gmail.com> <53487C1A.6060401@computer.org>
In-Reply-To: <53487C1A.6060401@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050403080901090305090302"
X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956527bd5036cbc8ac726065f69dd232a2d5782ba81b37a1ea5350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 107.1.141.74
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/c5zEK8w6UXon0Fs5pYw9Bfg0qYY
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same concept
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 18:09:27 -0000
Hello again folks, It turns out to be quite straightforward to revise the text so that the term "active source" is not needed. So, I don't need to make a definition for this term. Regards, Charlie P. On 4/11/2014 4:34 PM, Charles E. Perkins wrote: > Hello folks, > > PktSource means the source of the packet that triggered > the RERR. It could be renamed to be "RERR_Dest", since the > RERR is being sent to the source of the packet that triggered > the RERR. > > "active sources" are those actively sending data. I will make > a new definition for this. > > Regards, > Charlie P. > > > On 4/4/2014 1:32 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: >> IMHO, MANET has more concepts depending on the network use and >> status. Therefore it is good that this work considers many use cases. >> >> On Thursday, April 3, 2014, manet issue tracker wrote: >> >> #22: Multiple terms for same concept >> >> (Thomas Clausen) While we are on that, I notice that "active >> source" is >> used; I am not sure what that is vs a "source" and vs a !PktSource. >> >> >> It is clear in MANET that active node means there is sleep period >> within that node, so when the node is out of that period it is active. >> >> A >> source is someone who generates data traffic, I would suspect >> ... so an >> active source is....what? Or, is a source someone who can, but >> doesn't, >> generate data traffic? >> >> >> The source is a node that generates data. The active node is a node >> that generates data for some determined period of times, and does not >> receive/generate within sleeping periods. >> >> if so, what is the significance of that wrt. >> routing protocol operation? And, wrt a /reactive/ routing >> protocol, which >> I would assume constructs routes only for active >> source-destination pairs? >> >> >> I don't think that is correct. In MANET we say it MAY have LLN >> nodes so it is good AODVv2 considers LLNs scenarios. The ROLL WG have >> done a terminology RFC, I will try to continue the Manet terminology >> draft. The routing in LLNs and MANETs does construct routes not only >> for active source-destination pairs, but routes that have multihops >> with sleep periods as well. >> >> AB > > -- > Regards, > Charlie P.
- [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same con… manet issue tracker
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… Thomas Clausen
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… Charlie Perkins
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… manet issue tracker
- Re: [manet] #22 (aodvv2): Multiple terms for same… manet issue tracker