Re: [manet] Router's Implemetation and Running Code

For Router: LOADng running codes
++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sorry please read section 4>

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lavenu-lln-loadng-interoperability-report-04

If I am wrong please advise, I just trying to know the facts,

AB

On 2/21/13, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
> I read now again, please read section 4, that it called implemetation
> of specification  [LOADng-00], not the -06 or -08 (only from -06 is
> MANET).
>
> AB
> On 2/21/13, Jiazi Yi <ietf@jiaziyi.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Abdussalam Baryun
>> <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I understand that the implementation interoperability tests were
>>> conducted according to the specification in [LOADng-00].
>>
>> That's not true.
>> Before giving comments, please read related drafts first.
>> It was clearly called out in the interop draft, and loadng-08,
>> implementation status section.
>>
>> Jiazi
>>
>>> So it was
>>> implemented for LLNs not for MANETs, and that for future tests of same
>>> protocol in MANETs interoperability we will need test specification
>>> LOADng-06 not version 00. Do you think both will have same effects
>>> spec 00 and 06?
>>>
>>> AB
>>>
>>> On 1/17/13, Yuichi IGARASHI <yuichi.igarashi.hb@hitachi.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Abdussalam,
>>>>
>>>> We have two different independent implementations. Even in my company,
>>>> we had no director among implementors, because our main purpose was to
>>>> confirm the interoperability of LOADng spec.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Yuichi
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> manet mailing list
>>> manet@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
>>
>