Re: [manet] Router's Implemetation and Running Code

No, it is for 4 different, independent implementations. As the I-D that Henning cites clearly states.

Thomas

On Jan 15, 2013, at 12:34 , Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Henning,
> 
> thanks alot, but I think the tests reported by the doc is only for one
> implementation, not all 4 LOADng implementations, however, I will
> contact the authors of the doc, thanks,
> 
> AB
> 
> On 1/15/13, Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>> On 01/15/2013 12:14 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>>> As you agree with RFC2026, I can understand you mean that the 4
>>> implementation you refered to previously are interoperable, please
>>> confirm, and that they may work together,
>> 
>> Maybe this will answer your question? I think this document was already
>> mentioned on this list.
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lavenu-lln-loadng-interoperability-report-04
>> 
>> Henning Rogge
>> 
>> --
>> Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
>> Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
>> Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
>> Fraunhofer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
>> Telefon +49 228 9435-961,   Fax +49 228 9435 685
>> mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet