IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Router's Implemetation and Running Code

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Tue, 15 January 2013 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD7121F8703 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCJwrRCR1Klw for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f45.google.com (mail-vb0-f45.google.com [209.85.212.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F410521F86AE for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p1so389575vbi.32 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GNiHdZREwPWp3qjeyP0+5A2dn07IW3uVAHJg2B5dsfU=; b=BTg1Nj60/S6MwfW5o+ktVp+mlf9/EeR66TRnstI/lnbtIdyk9aXJKAqZzLxk0D8FkH Hqa8N75B499+sypbhiP/LH/GyTwHVVGVOULv35GQru2EiGQTPXi2gNwmflLdPXYCWXXR 0D9aPPcecDaGQCbYx51be/PeLz66GVCcw1CXI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=GNiHdZREwPWp3qjeyP0+5A2dn07IW3uVAHJg2B5dsfU=; b=bqJK9F0dOc/OCGVollUpdCRWNIz9lGO7LnBBwWpwc8eaKSY6LCWDFiZSWyLq5OMw87 Qvld1y3nEIPdOW4feDsSdqxhtmRWYiaRJhsnrR8y60V2WDX4IPNifPGU24IRf4LsEKcU vUfeLd3/Dx3K7bV767S8fUDshFHFd1vH466R9K4sWawhiXjZUJfwUr8B6V5iQaV5gASs O6idCHNrybwV9v4BZa46NNmgUKVSKxqOoe5aGw79Z+mv8Wx19fUK3o1l+I1mXvE0/kfm ZDyeGEsfEiKgbMnq1eTnVzzM0F8gj7bkIs/ZAU8Ob4ULf3peP+MaeWDztuCyZ7NbEh1R 86mw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.233.210 with SMTP id ty18mr95224957vec.46.1358271320068; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.5.16 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ88jTUXEj2DFNKA6ashTifAikmTORjeMipCeGapjM0q9+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ8-YUcqoby2PthUE1Dy9UKwEwuCAPKQdavNBsmzUPfg+0A@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_XFTW3xoHUjSbXZ1hkndHsLHoVg-D0YroPXTz_5y92_Q@mail.gmail.com> <50F53CC2.6040205@fkie.fraunhofer.de> <CADnDZ88jTUXEj2DFNKA6ashTifAikmTORjeMipCeGapjM0q9+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:35:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK=bVC8yHoaj9Ro8LV3KB0iyDVtqbCdkhx48a0WbnrUggbnyyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0102ee7c8a942c04d3572f1f"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkXYTkxWHBpXuznnIR+shKhrhF3Or4t4ULlG9oXAfwHEQzDccNx+cUDgCGyoSiFApfaVf7J
Cc: manet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] Router's Implemetation and Running Code
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:35:24 -0000

AB,

these are four different implementations, implemented by different people
solely based on the LOADng draft. They have been successfully tested in
these multiple interop tests.

Best regards
Ulrich

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Henning,
>
> thanks alot, but I think the tests reported by the doc is only for one
> implementation, not all 4 LOADng implementations, however, I will
> contact the authors of the doc, thanks,
>
> AB
>
> On 1/15/13, Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > On 01/15/2013 12:14 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> >> As you agree with RFC2026, I can understand you mean that the 4
> >> implementation you refered to previously are interoperable, please
> >> confirm, and that they may work together,
> >
> > Maybe this will answer your question? I think this document was already
> > mentioned on this list.
> >
> >
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lavenu-lln-loadng-interoperability-report-04
> >
> > Henning Rogge
> >
> > --
> > Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
> > Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
> > Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
> > Fraunhofer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
> > Telefon +49 228 9435-961,   Fax +49 228 9435 685
> > mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email