IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Router's Implemetation and Running Code

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 21 January 2013 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DB721F881D for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:34:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eUrcQXV5Grhq for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-da0-f51.google.com (mail-da0-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2483521F85C0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-da0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i30so2753005dad.10 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:34:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hqQFT9wts7FXerKqDGsZJ7YAWIcePPoTb7rIo7jEw+E=; b=CZZD8XMa9Uz6jeaFZnSQgoknuTijiH7NN+rEAro2g4VPSrMtwV5gqbAAnzoB4yoTlH F9th6RrJ2QfsSYkEzKql+2VXeQFYudHEaMfV+KwRrGdVhWxLfSYv5FyBi0hnlsoW+p6/ J8L51FScEtX+4SBM6DteGajmkqsrg/CwhejgcWLh5lc7Zd260hHBrCzznw8dxjG0uaMW qB11bQJSqj7R8tCGBMn9o29JV4kvT9yLNVeHEcNqzaUJx6vTBO2svAFxz2SyA+LzS2Mi 9J/6rTk7VO4eykKNHhh6bie+BBq6RFwdBKnyed2aZSrUyLZFQq8f9UevxRfvHCRzPPse WLfA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.72.226 with SMTP id g2mr47337411pav.67.1358778868286; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.218.134 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:34:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8-pj2O1PCiQanOFKXS1S5mWNfpX+rdW9RkqW1xzEjNqmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ8-YUcqoby2PthUE1Dy9UKwEwuCAPKQdavNBsmzUPfg+0A@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_XFTW3xoHUjSbXZ1hkndHsLHoVg-D0YroPXTz_5y92_Q@mail.gmail.com> <50F53CC2.6040205@fkie.fraunhofer.de> <CADnDZ88jTUXEj2DFNKA6ashTifAikmTORjeMipCeGapjM0q9+A@mail.gmail.com> <003601cdf453$c2736de0$475a49a0$@ndzh.com> <CADnDZ895mi0R0BxLsXmO2Pk3vFpgimRN_MzigV=B7=K9OeOXyw@mail.gmail.com> <68E4589B-5A28-401F-9338-C4D4081058F4@thomasclausen.org> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A7723212792@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <50FCE97D.3080501@fkie.fraunhofer.de> <CADnDZ88MSbFvJjtKXP0GbojFiyk8rgqdp8K_b9sG2fx_QMsVtQ@mail.gmail.com> <50FD2D5C.6010902@fkie.fraunhofer.de> <CADnDZ8-pj2O1PCiQanOFKXS1S5mWNfpX+rdW9RkqW1xzEjNqmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:34:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_ne8kxxcwNDugQJv7r17CsUebyWMQVVYmZw6DXXuE8jA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: manet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] Router's Implemetation and Running Code
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:34:34 -0000

Hi Henning

The below draft explains how OLSRv2 is used in funkfeuer, but not sure
of interoperability with other routers; please advise,

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-funkfeuer-manet-olsrv2-etx-01

AB
On 1/21/13, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Henning,
>
> Regarding the interop-testing, was there tests for interoperability
> for OLSRv1 or OLSRv2, as it is our completed standard. I am wondering
> if the Funkfeuer and Freifunk routers implemented differently and
> independetly, if yes it will be interesting to know if that test was
> done. Please advise,
>
> AB
>
> On 1/21/13, Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>> On 01/21/2013 12:47 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>>> Hi Henning,
>>>
>>> The interesting point in these LOADng-implemented codes that they were
>>> implemented differently and then tested together and reported in IETF,
>>> which I think is rare from companies/organisations to do that. IMHO, I
>>> think the test/report of interoperability of different and independent
>>> implementations is very important for router users and the market. I
>>> thank all who explained for me this including you, because I don't
>>> think it was discussed/understood before,
>>
>> Yes, it is...
>>
>> at the moment I am not even sure there is a single DYMO-25 compatible
>> implementation.
>>
>> Henning Rogge
>>
>>
>> --
>> Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
>> Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
>> Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
>> Fraunhofer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
>> Telefon +49 228 9435-961,   Fax +49 228 9435 685
>> mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email