Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-manet-timetlv-03

I think it would be useful for TimeTLV to specify a method for
carrying 'C'. I understand that normally nodes (or implementations)
might be configured with 'C' for each TimeTLV type. For cases where C
is either unknown or required, I think we should specify a format for
carrying it. I see carrying C as most important when C
misunderstandings could cause routing to fail.

I believe there are several different options for encoding this
information. What do you think would be the best way?

Ian

On Nov 15, 2007 9:48 PM, IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-manet-timetlv-03.txt has been successfuly submitted by Thomas Clausen and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Filename:        draft-ietf-manet-timetlv
> Revision:        03
> Title:           Representing multi-value time in MANETs
> Creation_date:   2007-11-15
> WG ID:           manet
> Number_of_pages: 18
>
> Abstract:
> This document describes a general and flexible TLV (type-length-value
> structure) for representing time using the generalized MANET packet/
> message format.  It defines two message and two address block TLVs
> for representing validity and interval times for MANET routing
> protocols.
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet