IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manycouches] [admin-discuss] Follow up on consultation on planning for IETF 111

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 00:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755883A2577 for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMkhmBw8MfwE for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 040873A2573 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id d17so150286plg.0 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=uSzVyfCzoM9/tBf98fLF8lvhiDgttshHysoRBGfyLIM=; b=CzzEdEeX9uIjRPSWeH6ea+fVjFoX1k7ZyfXn2maZI+hEHTsVhoNNmJQKW24NajoTyS ZTUStH3g11sELGIoDTyVGgz0Y14/ajrq8i+LKRnum8RTIK9NpQcc0bUtEBrEYRlfyWfF RcybPDz1Qgl9NVHCga0OXaUwYxwQ3+cDSlVsXlq0tmSuSUxgkxo7ZmOVdzvFQmqzv5uh RSLQlJu7ruKS5xXQ97eM6wMqYsKnWrqb336SZDf3ONerTgAPdl+Y/ZHhgIc/QG23SuoC ehNtdmOJVhyFF+Tgqssj7PFSFvVUOkrLr/X/2/zDvpRkbVfOpbOrLWgaFU1OdUKaYL8M rziA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=uSzVyfCzoM9/tBf98fLF8lvhiDgttshHysoRBGfyLIM=; b=NUrFvDOkKdEl5zRmOF7XIHFaNyZe7IUWFtQkZlUqlwlLCrVNMN6EXeAG+sXNliYCXz uonpaBazJj2ODg6/wK2c2XCRr/ZxkJ+7gUAefF2g+BacuCmcp8e6wrl8ySoLTw1wPoy8 r0O5vFTX5wJ6LCFdSFkQApDeDO5SDQm8ngHf7rwNBGxTn+b50mylgCHPzm8hLbwQ/q1D yEUz3AGRr/9SGYMdFrNK3/ggfSzBMLF/5PHEkKNlIjeKAiaqy484ny0pzSOe25PPE9tk i+k1GmTsWWA1OAYYhh7rO9PiF0ITayRzzXW7f28ZlZeb369kAp+27JK5hSs0wV1N9O5I TIyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qbTkbzt4OPkNGq0ToOAb5AogLBsiYFp3DWDM4ku0fjR4sQvkc 9e1TPuqF8Uz3aWcdeAD/9OY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2312meGGvTB5BeIPkiHtTcKAVWe/7zOv8IP09M/RPOl0VSto+GAq5+62iCZcMytze9hYPPw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:fe8a:b029:e6:5f:62e with SMTP id x10-20020a170902fe8ab02900e6005f062emr7696500plm.48.1618187352131; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ip72-205-75-17.sb.sd.cox.net. [72.205.75.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g4sm9316121pgu.46.2021.04.11.17.29.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Fred Baker <FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:29:10 -0700
Message-Id: <FBFBB034-33CA-48DF-9C94-9F322C85A879@gmail.com>
References: <LO2P265MB03999D8A17223E35312D8AC2C2719@LO2P265MB0399.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, shmoo <manycouches@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <LO2P265MB03999D8A17223E35312D8AC2C2719@LO2P265MB0399.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18E5140k)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/LR1EyF-rd7pHbKrevBzhW2hsA9E>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] [admin-discuss] Follow up on consultation on planning for IETF 111
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of remote meeting attendance and virtual IETF meetings, as well as for SHMOO working group" <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:29:19 -0000


Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 11, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting> wrote:
> 
> Without these in-person meetings I believe that the IETF risks fracturing into a number of largely separate activities with minimal overlap, increasingly driven by the interests of companies and with little regard for the "big picture".  In-person meetings build a sense of community as well as fostering the cross-pollination of ideas, diluting the former risks harming the community over the medium-term.  

I am of a similar opinion/concern.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email