IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manycouches] [admin-discuss] Follow up on consultation on planning for IETF 111

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E336A3A0E84 for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LnxQrP47_wMA for <manycouches@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4521D3A0E6B for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 13CLVxkC045979 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:31:59 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 97053207A6A for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:31:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB56201A29 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:31:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.14.0.65] ([10.14.0.65]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 13CLVx90007705 for <manycouches@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:31:59 +0200
To: manycouches@ietf.org
References: <3431E359-7CDE-43AE-9284-56A9C0AC3A1A@ietf.org> <d4eaa5ce-083f-7558-28a9-fc0df7d817a5@gmail.com> <80C5BA10-4D11-4B48-95F4-918ECC01579A@cable.comcast.com> <3bf17293-5a7d-78a2-b8cf-1b32de9b879c@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <39d33f1f-a2d6-5c96-bd50-e2a1cd09699d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:31:58 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3bf17293-5a7d-78a2-b8cf-1b32de9b879c@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manycouches/qmDyHkWXM4c7wsHcc0-bsi7Buw0>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] [admin-discuss] Follow up on consultation on planning for IETF 111
X-BeenThere: manycouches@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of remote meeting attendance and virtual IETF meetings, as well as for SHMOO working group" <manycouches.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manycouches/>
List-Post: <mailto:manycouches@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches>, <mailto:manycouches-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:32:04 -0000


Le 09/04/2021 à 22:21, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
> (Changing to a different list)
> 
> On 10-Apr-21 00:32, Livingood, Jason wrote:
>> You ask some far reaching & thoughtful questions and I look forward
>> to seeing what others think. In the meantime on one narrow point,
>> see below:
>> 
>> On 4/9/21, 8:25 AM, "admin-discuss on behalf of Alexandre Petrescu"
>> <admin-discuss-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of 
>> alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Is it worth polluting the air for something that could be decided
>>> online?
>> 
>> Pre-COVID the issue of environmental impact of IETF in person 
>> meetings was raised. The LLC studied this and conferred with an 
>> environmental impact expert as I think Jay related to the community
>> at the time. When meetings do resume partly in person, the good
>> news is that I believe the IETF now has a framework to estimate the
>> environmental impact and the thinking is to purchase carbon credits
>> to off-set this impact. I'm sure as we become ready for in person
>> meetings again, Jay will share more info about this and seek
>> additional comment - but I just wanted to mention it so folks
>> didn't think we had forgotten about it. :-)
> 
> I have fairly violent feelings about purchasing carbon credits as 
> virtue signalling, but rather than go there, let me ask whether 
> discussing a strategic decision to reduce the (post-pandemic) number
>  of meetings per year is within this WG's charter.

For my part, I dont know whether it is in Charter.

What I know is that at this time someone saying we'll meet in November
in-person is equally credible as someone saying we'll meet in two years
time and not before.  Reasons could be mentioned in favor of both.

In such an unknown situation it's probably impossible to Charter text
that says how many times a year to meet in person.

Alex


> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Manycouches mailing 
> list Manycouches@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email