Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <shmuel+mail-abuse-feedback-report@patriot.net> Fri, 26 August 2011 12:56 UTC
Return-Path: <shmuel+gen@patriot.net>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D283C21F8772 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 05:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.385
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.385 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.637, BAYES_20=-0.74, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y-g6kIucJLcM for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 05:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.patriot.net (smtp.patriot.net [209.249.176.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB4521F8742 for <marf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 05:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ECS35455305 (unknown [69.72.27.96]) (Authenticated sender: shmuel@patriot.net) by smtp.patriot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ECAF580A7 for <marf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:29:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Shmuel Metz <shmuel+mail-abuse-feedback-report@patriot.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:07:49 -0400
To: marf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4E5695C0.2010508@tana.it>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Mail-Followup-To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <MARF@IETF.ORG>
Organization: Atid/2
X-CompuServe-Customer: Yes
X-Coriate: NCAE@NewAmerica.org
X-Coriate: Mark Griffith <markgriffith@rocketmail.com>
X-Punge: Micro$oft
X-Terminate: SPA(GIS)
X-Treme: C&C,DWS
X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.18 BETA/60
Message-Id: <20110826122941.75ECAF580A7@smtp.patriot.net>
Subject: Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <MARF@IETF.ORG>
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:56:07 -0000
In <4E5695C0.2010508@tana.it>, on 08/25/2011 at 08:34 PM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> said: >I think you mean "MUA's provided by the _Mailbox Provider_ operator", Well, I suppose that in theory you could have split servers operated by different organization, but normally the MSA and MX are under common control, along with any POP3 or IMAP4 servers involved. IAC, I would expect the report to go via the MSA rather than the MX. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
- [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 J.D. Falk
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)