[marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <shmuel+mail-abuse-feedback-report@patriot.net> Wed, 24 August 2011 17:17 UTC
Return-Path: <shmuel+gen@patriot.net>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905EC21F8A64 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.731
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.731 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.868, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id utgt4LIC8M4L for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.patriot.net (smtp.patriot.net [209.249.176.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2008821F8751 for <MARF@IETF.ORG>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ECS35455305 (unknown [69.72.27.67]) (Authenticated sender: shmuel@patriot.net) by smtp.patriot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF68F5808C for <MARF@IETF.ORG>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:08:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Shmuel Metz <shmuel+mail-abuse-feedback-report@patriot.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:19:34 -0400
To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <MARF@IETF.ORG>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Mail-Followup-To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <MARF@IETF.ORG>
Organization: Atid/2
X-CompuServe-Customer: Yes
X-Coriate: NCAE@NewAmerica.org
X-Coriate: Mark Griffith <markgriffith@rocketmail.com>
X-Punge: Micro$oft
X-Terminate: SPA(GIS)
X-Treme: C&C,DWS
X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.18 BETA/60
Message-Id: <20110824170824.DDF68F5808C@smtp.patriot.net>
Subject: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <MARF@IETF.ORG>
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:17:08 -0000
There should be some discussion of MARF reports initiated from generic
MUA's rather than MUA's provided by the MSA operator.
There should be a statement that MARF is not meant to replace plain
text reports to abuse and postmaster, but rather is an additional
option.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
- [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 J.D. Falk
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)