Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00
"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Thu, 01 September 2011 19:21 UTC
Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6944821F925C for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZfCHpWl6y9a for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C455B21F9259 for <MARF@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.44] (c-76-126-154-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.126.154.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p81JMmgi002473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <MARF@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:22:50 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net p81JMmgi002473
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybernothing.org; s=fudge; t=1314904970; bh=8I9phgp/ssOIW0TNYtjEhGdqxlEQM0yDj51d9X73k UQ=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=di0p00tIWmVG AgJroXEYOqZ41WCg/htIVZuPiQq0CqaUgTIZY7Jt/brTJtTUqHM6+6epsBDTk7sYMPo w+QW/2O+r4jcayBBwmSdWtsfbPwieHeG13zdW5Vj00dANJrwSh6EFvtAmU6rlSj4r8v Fi2t7rYIIZ1GtJRRqANlu2thI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110824170824.DDF68F5808C@smtp.patriot.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:22:47 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E10059DE-53CC-40D4-B64A-0491596D07FD@cybernothing.org>
References: <20110824170824.DDF68F5808C@smtp.patriot.net>
To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <MARF@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:21:21 -0000
On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote: > There should be some discussion of MARF reports initiated from generic > MUA's rather than MUA's provided by the MSA operator. Do you have any examples of this type of functionality in MUAs available today? > There should be a statement that MARF is not meant to replace plain > text reports to abuse and postmaster, but rather is an additional > option. I believe we covered that in marf-base, but I wouldn't be opposed to saying it again. Can you suggest some appropriate language? -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
- [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 J.D. Falk
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
- Re: [marf] Comments on draft-jdfalk-marf-as-00 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)