IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [marf] Abuse reporting, was draft-jdfalk-marf-as

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Tue, 05 July 2011 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253A321F891F for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 10:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GW4yMg9EIi5Z for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 10:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1005521F8921 for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 10:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.32] (c-76-126-154-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.126.154.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p65HvZWr010422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 10:57:40 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net p65HvZWr010422
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybernothing.org; s=triac; t=1309888661; bh=S8n0o59LATXIAphxlBgFJHtOJitHKXa59sI5dXoCD og=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=ZfM0ZOsa4lUS uYSPQyGE4AUFatqeqY9WxTF8TKX4hJDn3HH5r8267xkoEi7JayQe8txnQksVz5+FXTV QW4vljaUoNmoclZcC5ViKr5z3JjBtqLzU9qTHCWV0ok96iRlUUQwmy2tppNNLMdMIl+ NhjkxXBVFAVXO2v3g7c9r8AIM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E0D8DD6.3030501@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 10:57:35 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B3415877-D514-4B7B-9742-BBDE9ECDF593@cybernothing.org>
References: <20110623192929.13813.qmail@joyce.lan> <4E04B896.5010604@tana.it> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134EBC4AB8@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4E0D8DD6.3030501@tana.it>
To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <marf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [marf] Abuse reporting, was draft-jdfalk-marf-as
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:57:44 -0000

On Jul 1, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:

> It is still unclear who should do what in this evolving scenario.
> There are lots of web pages entitled something like How To Complain To
> The Spammer's Provider, most of which are reminiscent of a time when
> there were no means to automate abuse reporting.  Updating such
> documentation is clearly out of WHOIS providers' scope.
> 
> What is this WG's opinion about such an additional document?

The problem is, it's already cross-functional /and/ it will refer to things like WEIRDS which are currently in the early stages of development.  So it's a moving target on many axes.

Maybe ASRG?

--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email