IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] Adoption call for "Requirements for a MASQUE Protocol to Proxy IP Traffic"

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656153A0D7B for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 07:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z67YplN70Ma4 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 07:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73F93A0D6B for <masque@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 07:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id q6so2442173ild.12 for <masque@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 07:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xvl91nMgjSKMLMdQbwfDzDpiF/m1VlhvvmUSDqamrA4=; b=rpOFFeT2DADw5sje9R5yZxS+8lRbtEzkxy48VgR6JgtQuU+CHgRdMTNtJQvxafHXG8 60JMdKM2wVHwzdMP5hMp3SL0Nt1x25BYHVzj1rKg6Q3C0P15AvTgQdG0DcfTi7ujx2bp i9mgO1YUVZdBG+2wZ3J2ilDpOxBXBkFQsR1+W374Ybro9dB7G721jdLu14H9VD8NcXnU N4zhw0Ou1aycmFjqPxsdTGzlZlb3zdkjTd/3H2Vp+HhiU2+ZANPIkS1+I7SxcD/YiXVv 7/oaSGz0BE5w5dQBWMfOerViB4zjtoSHVp+UjgGW66jwF+Q9DeGzh2ATYXpqtNsw5Czc ga6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xvl91nMgjSKMLMdQbwfDzDpiF/m1VlhvvmUSDqamrA4=; b=VagE+mQq2cFWAbX7zQaw8iPaflisa4UNWv0sgmdPVsRwQKtuuISKwh3/mOANNVJg3M VmQLXnr2nbX27CCBmwJehZcToQAqpfv6H//KLuo8UADbZJ9BuuhLXS0OymR0I6xMTDGV A9DKKn28MWjNdRH8vu0Mk5EuT0ywE/j2DI908K58Y3a2KKDt9Lh1IuetNIuChANQ0BOD tKGij6N+wrT2fOYrHZdlfo6tVc25MZGHJnp0nprHGlrUoiKrc9uqhoMtlbXHYiedIGJf RfkpVB3RKe6A4DaEXQETtAlE3pVg8GdPBjfKtwl13Dop1vGdF32lid5imAe/eMFAXZYB FVvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333aKV+7uR/ScSIryWkjO1fHMigOdbmTOtgyoe79T5RPtgxr3lF IW7Si9ILrm8GtbfXrUWOj3M6V23f1mCiCPH65WIjQQGz4mcqiA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJqKeffMjiuNSfMyGpLNetWjQ+D3cxd6MMVDw+mUHc3kiq5nNpaQ2LO/PVfTm0DNjDGzRaN1AcfQzmroAJ0J4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1141:: with SMTP id o1mr3711824ill.275.1599661244873; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 07:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4f83a742-e6c3-4aef-a26b-1801ecf19cdf@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f83a742-e6c3-4aef-a26b-1801ecf19cdf@www.fastmail.com>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:20:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsBshA3=8W7py4w5rhRSPXrf89uqCx+NJEn6gRKa0-gd7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
Cc: MASQUE <masque@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="0000000000004a472d05aee22805"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/7hCDQBk35CEECdSoBwjnL9zWSlY>
Subject: Re: [Masque] Adoption call for "Requirements for a MASQUE Protocol to Proxy IP Traffic"
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:20:48 -0000

I support adoption.  (Per [1], I would suggest using the document state
"Adopted for WG info only".)

I would like to see a requirement for compatibility with existing IETF IP
tunnel layers like PPP (and IPCP/IPV6CP).  Ideally, we could avoid
reinventing these protocols, and just carry them over HTTP.  Failing that,
I'd like to make sure that we can at least expose a PPP-compatible
interface around MASQUE-IP, or provide instructions for chaining PPP and
MASQUE-IP links with a minimum of mismatch.

[1] https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/support-documents/

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:31 AM Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> wrote:

> One of the goals on our charter is producing a requirements document for
> IP proxying. draft-cms-masque-ip-proxy-reqs is one attempt at accomplishing
> this goal. Based on feedback received during the last meeting and the
> document revision since, we'd like to start an adoption call for this
> document in its current form as a starting point.
>
> The document may be found here:
>
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cms-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/
>
> And the source may be found here:
>
>    https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/masque-drafts
>
> This call for adoption will conclude on September 23.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris and Eric
>
> --
> Masque mailing list
> Masque@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email