IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] Adoption call for "Requirements for a MASQUE Protocol to Proxy IP Traffic"

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 18 September 2020 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934833A0EC8 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3LYIT7yotJHY for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E433A0EBB for <masque@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com with SMTP id x8so4640526ybm.3 for <masque@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IJUcG2WdZ5hMP1UUXVP9awssTkno+okB5ZBIZdNlROs=; b=L7rezvwf6U8449MKe9qU/OLqXnxl3yUXhbvmc3tidkfPOVhY+HqwUYv3rtWlIs58Zx 2Wt4D+wBCDf6FdU1+7Ew+8jxzXT+x5cP2Mag39dTtrx5XWAu4vavVMF3SE4uacDnVJPW ynSgzyJjexizhwykCBBDokfKVGgfXNqb+hqIHscqYHvw23OUDuNr1lz5BKmwoVnwjQHh u/iuQAoUXayN4tHGYXUJ3YBnbHmEEacNM2aJp6GMby4pnaPChEnqO6AK1Yl8DlnPQ6W5 cQk6wuPobTz3mQuWyI6f7ZPk+8zgbNDuZN4bBdL8dH7P5+HFCH24p7UuJ6kFmwBkG9QX Fr4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IJUcG2WdZ5hMP1UUXVP9awssTkno+okB5ZBIZdNlROs=; b=h24j4OpYFCRP2eSPgNStNaQPR9gAdbFG74UsVLWP7P1BClUksgZWvqjsmioG+atzlQ et6gwUBa1Hcb+y1jERrOOk/hglR03w+bob+zY+JJoSWxjR7E0k85ZOGb3Iy9c66s8mMp +X4RTX05jNz2VBDShG9MAp58Esd9lPGlJPeP2QqwsnckDM9L0Ywqdxf54gleFxCL8+dV 1zsN1GgPF+jJ7rlnE2anEBe9Jne6N5I8rwsvq8IKk0T9gLE9R3pphJhrXuLPqT7F8Xgj +FgXqh+OnBP0yE2O8Y2joYX/HJnKEiGOBuwPlUwr7jBpcHtU5tGQnZED8za+aANqqJtg FKdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wQtuL0uRByaARSpP2tfukJ+Ts8dYm/i5MK37Fh5l5y99FPxWs q3WWRBYIRg7AdCSjiqT4emE1MpIDXb3Eo4ZSMxyj5L2tlhg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjjgyAD5+Y87uc7J0Dc3tJFUGl6yteq3j67ZXUq2NFQhH1u/8UePieLWoKLs2OUWuvCLlFqQg0Icz6MqWp+Zo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:4d1:: with SMTP id v17mr47664729ybs.389.1600443797046; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4f83a742-e6c3-4aef-a26b-1801ecf19cdf@www.fastmail.com> <d360df8c2870acdc4b312ab3f5f9031610a24703.camel@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <d360df8c2870acdc4b312ab3f5f9031610a24703.camel@ericsson.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:42:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fbdUgpCuBZ57sU+Nv=qB8+zBRCfjqUZ7KneZrEpxu0fQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "masque@ietf.org" <masque@ietf.org>, "caw@heapingbits.net" <caw@heapingbits.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000187f905af985c71"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/lUyBV12-HIJubd5RW6VDeDQuHsA>
Subject: Re: [Masque] Adoption call for "Requirements for a MASQUE Protocol to Proxy IP Traffic"
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:43:20 -0000

So, just to start the discussion Magnus said we need to have (and I agree
that we need to have it, whether before, or after, adoption),

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:27 AM Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=
40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

Which of these requirements (in
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cms-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-01.txt)

3.1.  IP Session Establishment
3.2.  Proxying of IP packets
3.3.  Maximum Transmission Unit
3.4.  IP Assignment
3.5.  Route Negotiation
3.6.  Identity
3.7.  Transport Security
3.8.  Authentication
3.9.  Reliable Transmission of IP Packets
3.10.  Flow Control
3.11.  Indistinguishability
3.12.  Support HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
3.13.  Multiplexing
3.14.  Load balancing
3.15.  Extensibility

belongs to each use case?


> 2.1.  Consumer VPN
> 2.2.  Point to Point Connectivity
> 2.3.  Point to Network Connectivity
> 2.4.  Network to Network Connectivity
>

(I'm happy to have this conversation in Github, but Magnus said we needed
to have it here, so I'm following his excellent leadership)

Best,

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email