Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?

Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net> Tue, 01 May 2012 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lenny@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3894421E81A5 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFEohy6rFr+i for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og113.obsmtp.com (exprod7og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539F921E80A2 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT6AN0HUQ+UX1V3YhTWWFXqZfmNv+q5It@postini.com; Tue, 01 May 2012 09:22:41 PDT
Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:21:30 -0700
Received: from eng-mail01.juniper.net (eng-mail01.juniper.net [172.17.28.114]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id q41GLQ195287 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:21:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lenny@juniper.net)
Received: by eng-mail01.juniper.net (Postfix, from userid 1709) id 4BC3D11489; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eng-mail01.juniper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412851144F for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 09:21:26 -0700
From: Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>
To: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120419153427.X31500@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
Message-ID: <20120501091813.D33698@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
References: <mailman.2854.1334523092.3230.mboned@ietf.org> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76A760955@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20120419153427.X31500@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 16:22:42 -0000

There appears to be consensus to adopt draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps 
as a WG doc in MBONED.

Authors- please resubmit with appropriate draft-ietf-... name.


On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Leonard Giuliano wrote:

-) 
-) The authors of both drafts have agreed that 
-) draft-eubanks-mboned-transition-overview will be abandoned and 
-) draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps will the basis for further work in 
-) multicast transition.
-) 
-) Please speak up in support of/opposition to adopting 
-) draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps as an MBONED document by Fri, April 27.  
-) 
-) The 10 folks who have already responded to Tom's original email need not 
-) reply again- you're support is noted.
-) 
-) 
-) 
-) 
-) On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Ronald Bonica wrote:
-) 
-) -) Tom,
-) -) 
-) -) The next step in the process is for the chairs to post a question to the WG asking whether this draft should be adopted as a WG item. An important part of that message is a cut-off date for responses. Without that, we have no idea how long we should wait before expecting a consensus call.
-) -) 
-) -) I have asked the chairs to post this message.
-) -) 
-) -)                                           Ron
-) -) 
-) -) > 
-) -) > Message: 1
-) -) > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:51:23 -0400
-) -) > From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
-) -) > To: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
-) -) > Subject: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
-) -) > Message-ID: <4F8B34CB.1060306@gmail.com>
-) -) > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
-) -) > 
-) -) > At the meeting, there was solid support for using draft-jaclee-behave-
-) -) > v4v6-mcast-ps as the basis for further work in multicast transition. In
-) -) > addition, the agreed wording of the charter at the beginning of the
-) -) > meeting included coverage of the topic:
-) -) > 
-) -) > "Develop requirements for tools that assist in multicast ... transition
-) -) > ..."
-) -) > 
-) -) > In view of these findings, will the Chairs consider making draft-jaclee
-) -) > an Mboned Workiong Group document?
-) -) > 
-) -) > Tom Taylor
-) -) > 
-) -) > 
-) -) > ------------------------------
-) -) > 
-) -) 
-) -) _______________________________________________
-) -) MBONED mailing list
-) -) MBONED@ietf.org
-) -) https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
-) -) 
-)