Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?

The authors of both drafts have agreed that 
draft-eubanks-mboned-transition-overview will be abandoned and 
draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps will the basis for further work in 
multicast transition.

Please speak up in support of/opposition to adopting 
draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps as an MBONED document by Fri, April 27.  

The 10 folks who have already responded to Tom's original email need not 
reply again- you're support is noted.

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Ronald Bonica wrote:

-) Tom,
-) 
-) The next step in the process is for the chairs to post a question to the WG asking whether this draft should be adopted as a WG item. An important part of that message is a cut-off date for responses. Without that, we have no idea how long we should wait before expecting a consensus call.
-) 
-) I have asked the chairs to post this message.
-) 
-)                                           Ron
-) 
-) > 
-) > Message: 1
-) > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:51:23 -0400
-) > From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
-) > To: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
-) > Subject: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
-) > Message-ID: <4F8B34CB.1060306@gmail.com>
-) > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
-) > 
-) > At the meeting, there was solid support for using draft-jaclee-behave-
-) > v4v6-mcast-ps as the basis for further work in multicast transition. In
-) > addition, the agreed wording of the charter at the beginning of the
-) > meeting included coverage of the topic:
-) > 
-) > "Develop requirements for tools that assist in multicast ... transition
-) > ..."
-) > 
-) > In view of these findings, will the Chairs consider making draft-jaclee
-) > an Mboned Workiong Group document?
-) > 
-) > Tom Taylor
-) > 
-) > 
-) > ------------------------------
-) > 
-) 
-) _______________________________________________
-) MBONED mailing list
-) MBONED@ietf.org
-) https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
-) 