Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Thu, 19 April 2012 22:09 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B5311E80CC for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.538
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.538 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQXwT6ecXU5e for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com (exprod7og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD9B11E80BB for <mboned@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT5CNCC+Vpq1Rk+ThlPNbcG2T1TM1Rf9v@postini.com; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:09:12 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:06:56 -0700
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by p-cldfe02-hq.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:06:55 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:06:52 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:06:51 -0400
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
Thread-Index: Ac0bSY12qUtZwbgtQCm4rpZclA5DKADLtBOg
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76A760955@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <mailman.2854.1334523092.3230.mboned@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2854.1334523092.3230.mboned@ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:09:20 -0000
Tom, The next step in the process is for the chairs to post a question to the WG asking whether this draft should be adopted as a WG item. An important part of that message is a cut-off date for responses. Without that, we have no idea how long we should wait before expecting a consensus call. I have asked the chairs to post this message. Ron > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:51:23 -0400 > From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> > To: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org> > Subject: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? > Message-ID: <4F8B34CB.1060306@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > At the meeting, there was solid support for using draft-jaclee-behave- > v4v6-mcast-ps as the basis for further work in multicast transition. In > addition, the agreed wording of the charter at the beginning of the > meeting included coverage of the topic: > > "Develop requirements for tools that assist in multicast ... transition > ..." > > In view of these findings, will the Chairs consider making draft-jaclee > an Mboned Workiong Group document? > > Tom Taylor > > > ------------------------------ >
- [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Tom Taylor
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Tina TSOU
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Lee, Yiu
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Stig Venaas
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? xiaohong.deng
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Qiong
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Zhouqian (Cathy)
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? christian.jacquenet
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Bill Atwood
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Ronald Bonica
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Leonard Giuliano
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Bill Atwood
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Jacni Qin
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Simon Perreault
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? thomas.morin
- Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document? Leonard Giuliano