Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?

<thomas.morin@orange.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.morin@orange.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D474621F8799 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CN7exKxepCfR for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725F621F8798 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id F0D1F5D8A53 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:17:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84385D82E0 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:17:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:17:10 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: from 10.193.21.179 ([10.193.21.179]) by ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.53]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:17:09 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Organization: France Telecom Orange
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:17:47 +0200
Message-ID: <BAF83494CE653943A97B9F755016A06609F471DE@ftrdmel1>
In-Reply-To: <20120419153427.X31500@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
Thread-Index: Ac0iA2jLoFB28pfGS2KQS9Rlxm4HMg==
References: <mailman.2854.1334523092.3230.mboned@ietf.org> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76A760955@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20120419153427.X31500@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
From: thomas.morin@orange.com
To: mboned@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2012 10:17:10.0660 (UTC) FILETIME=[69114C40:01CD2203]
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:17:14 -0000

Support.

-Thomas

Leonard Giuliano :
> The authors of both drafts have agreed that
> draft-eubanks-mboned-transition-overview will be abandoned and
> draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps will the basis for further work in
> multicast transition.
>
> Please speak up in support of/opposition to adopting
> draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps as an MBONED document by Fri, April 27.
>
> The 10 folks who have already responded to Tom's original email need not
> reply again- you're support is noted.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Ronald Bonica wrote:
>
> -) Tom,
> -)
> -) The next step in the process is for the chairs to post a question to the WG asking whether this draft should be adopted as a WG item. An important part of that message is a cut-off date for responses. Without that, we have no idea how long we should wait before expecting a consensus call.
> -)
> -) I have asked the chairs to post this message.
> -)
> -)                                           Ron
> -)
> -)>
> -)>  Message: 1
> -)>  Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:51:23 -0400
> -)>  From: Tom Taylor<tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
> -)>  To: MBONED WG<mboned@ietf.org>
> -)>  Subject: [MBONED] draft-jaclee as WG document?
> -)>  Message-ID:<4F8B34CB.1060306@gmail.com>
> -)>  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> -)>
> -)>  At the meeting, there was solid support for using draft-jaclee-behave-
> -)>  v4v6-mcast-ps as the basis for further work in multicast transition. In
> -)>  addition, the agreed wording of the charter at the beginning of the
> -)>  meeting included coverage of the topic:
> -)>
> -)>  "Develop requirements for tools that assist in multicast ... transition
> -)>  ..."
> -)>
> -)>  In view of these findings, will the Chairs consider making draft-jaclee
> -)>  an Mboned Workiong Group document?
> -)>
> -)>  Tom Taylor
> -)>
> -)>
> -)>  ------------------------------
> -)>
> -)
> -) _______________________________________________
> -) MBONED mailing list
> -) MBONED@ietf.org
> -) https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> -)
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned