Re: [MBONED] ipv4 multicast address ranges, actual usage.

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Wed, 18 December 2019 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BC9120C59 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:01:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AFmnP9dQ58tw for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 554F01208AA for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id r13so3481400ioa.3 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:01:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NP+VdZ6A8RiSSgtAWyyi6xBzSGXae9JS2gkNY7+CJKI=; b=FHvw6VchInCFPkC67tpiS+g5ALZ5ZOPIeGotISo5lo5d5Uz3NxroBgnn2UyUJIfnU1 v9GmOnpHMYSwSF0KHovmjVNooOVuQaQFRxaLwpkgQJxxBVK6GyYa3+IknN2850k2GAIn rouLPJzDNMNKiRXoIcNouuUNnzxPFfkDvVpz/tkrs7ZPP7hcVf+74Vk/qPO88isIsxw7 jzC0YtSmQDOCFe0T/KGBqslacXxCH0HalxAYToMe1Anxj+BoV3CUYGqBmPfk9A5tzeBX MbYRdRuyW+30SDKY1XCG67LExpZwSmLFX3B+ElVQDmrdWi7n5WpEgeCJ6kDNq2jUfttf dEwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NP+VdZ6A8RiSSgtAWyyi6xBzSGXae9JS2gkNY7+CJKI=; b=Wo07ekHo4eR7J3Hxa+NCQJSwmOuvvX/tkxuTqitcyqLDCYJh4i8TRADeLjjQ2amOJ/ V08BEMFtI/x4I37oKbUImKBetmtPB4NFhFGELEciZ6ls5X1hNFccTbusOLriTbia/92Z H27pWvyXKwcP7EsjnA0601+4sNm8kZotl/Z0eBkhgt9RxvQFThxWk70Tx3YIX+S0z6Ht Io6Ik/HWrmod5+8lNWUGRysjmTbZD2bRR1i4laHQWqpqKri8x2YGsXBKLm0OYO08gUl7 q1bxxkloC3KAhoR0aQyR+W6zGqu+XwLcOcPjxU2AzBtvKbgA1UEqfPKvx7nryCOwmtfN 2EBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWC2GUCzrsXJ3c5htuPCP+htt542S4K8gmeqTMiai0W13a1wNKB lDSDew7Sub+QGUXghFV/aFxUOmcdm+6XsX/ls3XpnduS
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwNCUHYcuIsm1WZbtEzXRG3U2qyCh98E0sPPGTPY1inoQNb3bdh5Yam0NhfY+isn9RMsFiBVqOMDymv/NDwyzM=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:6515:: with SMTP id u21mr4101264jab.82.1576702899446; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:01:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA93jw6Wy=+cc1kHNm97SMjYW31KNhaEM4KXZo=nFcCkG9UjCQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1912181240340.5406@contrail-ubm-wing.svec1.juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1912181240340.5406@contrail-ubm-wing.svec1.juniper.net>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:01:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7MtXtHVxGnJnZTovSi+o8rtssf2f0uKn-7YNn+YgUg6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>
Cc: mboned@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/76X6t42DiWc3xJkkvJVlZ_y0kF4>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] ipv4 multicast address ranges, actual usage.
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:01:42 -0000

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 12:49 PM Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> Take a look at RFC6308 and RFC 5771 for an overview of multicast
> addressing.  But to summarize, 232/8 is reserved for SSM (RFC4607).
> 233/8 is reserved for GLOP (RFC3180).  234/8 is reserved for
> Unicast-Prefix-Based Allocation (RFC6034).  239/8 is reserved for admin
> scoped allocation (RFC2365).

I had already reviewed those pretty thoroughly in writing the drafty draft.

The question was:

"to what extent are the various allocations in the 232/8 to 238/8
range actually used today, and for
what?"

The "for what" portion of the question was: what applications today
actually use GLOP? or RFC6038? or SSM?

What mailing list or list might have some answers to the actual usage
of these ranges?

As best as I can tell actual multicast usage of ipv4 is down to the
dozens of applications (all with allocated ip address in 224 or 239 -
with mdns topping the list.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Lenny
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> | As a few people know I've been working (quixotically) in my spare time
> | towards making more of the IPv4 address space generally usable. We've
> | landed patches for 0/8 in linux, and 240/4 had already been mostly
> | made working a decade back.
> |
> | Now we come against a harder problem, in that 1) - a vast swath of
> | multicast address space was never allocated for anything by iana
> | (225/8-231/8) and 2) 232/8-238/8 appears severely underutilized. Only
> | portions of 224/8 and 239/8 seem to have any usage at all.
> |
> | We've successfully made that first formerly multicast range pretty
> | generally usable in a string of patches on our github for various oses
> | and routing daemons. https://github.com/dtaht/unicast-extensions - and
> | for a drafty draft of a draft internet draft, see:
> | https://github.com/dtaht/unicast-extensions/blob/master/rfcs/draft-gilmore-taht-v4uniext.txt
> |
> | My question today, though (lacking finding a mailing list more
> | suitable than this - is there one?), is to what extent are the various
> | allocations in the 232/8 to 238/8 range actually used today, and for
> | what?
> |
> |
> | --
> | Make Music, Not War
> |
> | Dave Täht
> | CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> | https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.teklibre.com__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!ToLvTOd6t8dQ1-sH4XmghgDQrcb4JVFwnxuPeA-h4IwQmqxaVhSKHdAeEcHC_4g$
> | Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | MBONED mailing list
> | MBONED@ietf.org
> | https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!ToLvTOd6t8dQ1-sH4XmghgDQrcb4JVFwnxuPeA-h4IwQmqxaVhSKHdAe8DjJ-24$
> |



-- 
Make Music, Not War

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729