[MEXT] 答复: Re: 答复: The first proposal for the DMM charter

luo.wen@zte.com.cn Thu, 15 December 2011 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <luo.wen@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80B521F8A91 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:05:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -90.56
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-90.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.370, BAYES_50=0.001, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Memp3LvvtjJL for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CE521F8A7E for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:05:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 566901783477680; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:18:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [] by [] with StormMail ESMTP id 95341.4405237714; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:35:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id pBF0ZJq5018435; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:35:19 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from luo.wen@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhjuwkPmYfrY+bD7rvUEhsnU6r4vCmgGswoYxansxbwS68w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: ED49F6F5:B9C35824-48257967:0002F383; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFED49F6F5.B9C35824-ON48257967.0002F383-48257967.00033B14@zte.com.cn>
From: luo.wen@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:35:12 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-12-15 08:35:20, Serialize complete at 2011-12-15 08:35:20
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00033B1248257967_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn pBF0ZJq5018435
Cc: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, mext@ietf.org
Subject: [MEXT] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUmU6ICC08Li0OiAgVGhlIGZpcnN0IHByb3Bv?= =?gb2312?b?c2FsIGZvciB0aGUgRE1NIGNoYXJ0ZXI=?=
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:05:48 -0000

Hi Julien

Thank you for correcting me


Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> 
发件人:  mext-bounces@ietf.org
2011-12-15 01:28

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>om>, mext@ietf.org
Re: [MEXT] 答复:  The first proposal for the DMM charter


2011/12/14 <luo.wen@zte.com.cn>
> Hi  jouni:
> I have a quick question about  'Goals and Milestones'.
> As it is stated 'If limitations are identified as part of the above 
deliverable, specify extensions to existing protocols that removes these 
limitations within a distributed mobility management environment.' which 
means, I guess, a solution will be created for remove these limitations 
and a RFC will be needed.
> So why the  'Goals and Milestones' misses this part? Or does it mean the 
solution for remove these limitaions is also included in the I-D 'Best 
practices and Gap Analysis' ?

It's not missing, it is covered as part of this milestone:

 Nov 2012 - Evaluate the need for additional working group document(s)
            for extensions to fill the identified gaps.

MEXT mailing list