Re: [mif-arch-dt] New Version Notification for draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-00.txt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Sun, 14 July 2013 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99D311E812D for <mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kDkR+QE3OEbz for <mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og102.obsmtp.com (exprod7og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.157]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C059C21F9A2E for <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUeLH064pzncr98LRpAYypFy0TaKCk21C@postini.com; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:46:27 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037991B823A for <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAE0A190052; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:46:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 08:46:27 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [mif-arch-dt] New Version Notification for draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOgKlMgskeq57cV0aDBL0beAnnQA==
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:46:26 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077520F8D2@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <20130714041913.29430.66253.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <e7573b69f58a4f0b903cf7a3ae03cf48@SN2PR03MB077.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <e7573b69f58a4f0b903cf7a3ae03cf48@SN2PR03MB077.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E80496B460097E469C5A6DC5D59930C4@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mif-arch-dt@ietf.org" <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif-arch-dt] New Version Notification for draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mif-arch-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIF Architecture Design Team mailing list <mif-arch-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif-arch-dt>, <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif-arch-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt>, <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:46:44 -0000

On Jul 14, 2013, at 12:24 AM, Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I've just posted the first version of the MPD arch draft based on the teleconfs and list discussions we've had so far. If possible, please take a look before the Monday call and comment.

Thanks for doing this, Dmitry.   Margaret and Deng Hui, I don't think a meeting invite has been sent yet...