Re: [mif-arch-dt] New Version Notification for draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-00.txt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Sun, 14 July 2013 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1910821F9D7E for <mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.009, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KR04dEr4NNYY for <mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og103.obsmtp.com (exprod7og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937D121F90A7 for <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUeLg5uPLu7KumrCYz8bc0DcGY/NRp7jx@postini.com; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:33:28 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BE21B821E for <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A756190052; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:33:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 10:33:25 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [mif-arch-dt] New Version Notification for draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOgLTcDYvggc0BC0uAPkuYqdFP0Zlk5GoA
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 17:33:24 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077520FF35@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <20130714041913.29430.66253.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>, <e7573b69f58a4f0b903cf7a3ae03cf48@SN2PR03MB077.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>, <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077520F8D2@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <COL125-W18540CAF9DC0FBAD76EFD8B1660@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <COL125-W18540CAF9DC0FBAD76EFD8B1660@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB18030"
Content-ID: <A10739DBB2EF2D4EB0CA49A94CE45510@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mif-arch-dt@ietf.org" <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>, Dmitry Anipko <dmitry.anipko@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [mif-arch-dt] New Version Notification for draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mif-arch-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIF Architecture Design Team mailing list <mif-arch-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif-arch-dt>, <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif-arch-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt>, <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 17:33:44 -0000

On Jul 14, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Meeting invitation is keeping change, and has been updated 15th, and you have accepted it for 15th meeting already?
> can you kindly help to check it again?

Oops, you're right—thanks.   I was looking at the wrong week.