Re: [mif] WG LC for MIF PS

Laganier, Julien a écrit :
> Hello,
> 

Julien, is there any way you can be more specific in what is missing?

Marc.

> Some of us have put together a draft to begin working on the MIF Current Practice Analysis [1]. As a starting point to the analysis, we have re-classified / expanded on the problems listed in earlier version of the problem statement, and communicated that to the authors. Some of our comments were integrated in the last PS draft, but not all.
> 
> So my comment towards WGLC is that I'd like the full problem list documented in our draft [1] to be incorporated into the MIF PS. If we can't agree to do that, I'd like to discuss a bit more why some of the problems listed in our drafts were not considered valid.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --julien
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cao-mif-analysis-00
> 
> Hui Deng wrote:
>>
>> We appear ready to start the working group last call for our PS documents.  
>> This is a two-week WGLC.
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-02.txt
>>  
>> This is a two week WGLC finishing on March 26.  Please send substantive
>> review comments to mif@ietf.org 
>>  
>> Thanks,
>>  
>> -Hui
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

-- 
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN news service: http://reeves.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca