Re: [mif] WG LC for MIF PS

Dear Authors,

Some comments below:

3.1 Below IP Interaction
Do we need to consider some below-ip layer techniques like Virtual interfaces?

3.4 Address selection
It is good to mention that some OS like OSX does not implement
3484-like policy table. Default behavior of the 3484 policy table is
to prefer IPv6 over IPv4, but this behavior in some situations are not
optimal and need to be changed.

3.5 Finding and Sharing IP Addresses with Peers
I do not think we need to consider the application referral behavior,
and it is out of scope of mif. I suggest removing the Grobj referral
to ip address referral generally.

4.1, bullet 6,
it is not a dns selection problem, rather it is the address selection problem.
The dns selection problem related to DNS64 is covered in
draft-wing-behave-dns64-config-02.

a typo here is "quaranteed", should be "guaranteed"

4.3 Address Selection Policy
I suggest add some text on IP family selection as one bullet, some
symptoms are introduced in draft-cao-mif-ifs.

"The inconsistency of host's application IP family, interface address
family and remote end's IP family makes the IP family selection
problem difficult.  Wrongly choosing the ip family will result into
communication failure. "

Thanks,
Zhen

2010/3/12 Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>:
>
> We appear ready to start the working group last call for our PS documents.
> This is a two-week WGLC.
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-02.txt
>
> This is a two week WGLC finishing on March 26.  Please send substantive
> review comments to mif@ietf.org
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Hui
>
> ________________________________
> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now.
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>
>