IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] WG LC for MIF PS

Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Mon, 22 March 2010 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EECC3A692C for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.39
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0zTzkOE9z5A4 for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f217.google.com (mail-gx0-f217.google.com [209.85.217.217]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95F43A67BD for <mif@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so195430gxk.8 for <mif@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sXSKlxSE4qxNaQ5FPuZsAzry5ioyqwxwC6nTmNbRRHs=; b=J+OGh6+P7mlEEiRplFNeuDmpmRN0C7KdL+9y3l34mJXBtxynkwQEzlitRcEJPIS1Dr lF5je39jX3PjaeKCgYcVJACrwV97DW8q1yqW5PxcTZSzUnUy1ijx+pxtNlRkSNuv3JG9 4+8vSGzTjsOWQ3SAflZkazJT0JyrSWGUzoT64=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cmWPkPI+1Sw5fJKKG4AUB10uxP+fAGDrz3Vo2jN4d5lz7fd68ADMgdbMVFamxBvCWQ zZw4ggHa4WdC//XVWBJtrl+WWSL6Tw5OI9ACr3BCIuM57UdLaCMnN0NVgAsN40tc9jRn nJumL4m2iA8BkYijzdJKHoiTB+s7rLWGEZKX0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.154.5 with SMTP id g5mr14456124ano.224.1269219103153; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F589CD261C9@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <COL118-W43D1A92D6FAECE336508C6B1310@phx.gbl> <c549bac51003192246t62c91c1cw925afa82aae62d30@mail.gmail.com> <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F589CD261C9@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:43 -0700
Message-ID: <c549bac51003211751k7e59b1e2w47a498147c1e18b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: teemu.savolainen@nokia.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: mif@ietf.org, denghui02@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [mif] WG LC for MIF PS
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:51:31 -0000

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:32 AM,  <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> 4.1, bullet 6,
>> it is not a dns selection problem, rather it is the address selection
>> problem.
>> The dns selection problem related to DNS64 is covered in
>> draft-wing-behave-dns64-config-02.
>
> I don't fully follow - this section is talking about dns server selection problems and also address usage limitations. Do you think the bullet 6 should be somewhere else then? Then probably also bullet 4 and 5? IMHO it is ok to have both dns server selection problems and problems on limited scope of usability of addresses learned from DNS servers.

OK, the problems are linked.

>
> The draft-wing-behave-dns64-config might be something to add as a reference in section 4, but this has been also described earlier in draft-savolainen-mif-dns-server-selection draft.

Yes, I did not noticed that your draft had already mentioned the
problem of DNS64 selection. Thanks.

Regards,
Zhen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email